 |
Dawn of the Cosmopolitan: The Hope of a Global Citizens Movement
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Kriegman et al.
Planetary phase of history: support for the latency hypothesis
Globalization arises out of a centuries-long process that accelerated dramatically over the last
50 years. The formation of the UN, ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Accords among other landmark treaties, and development of institutions such as the International Criminal Court, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and the World Trade Organization (WTO) express the growing need to develop new forms of cooperation at the global level. Yet, the tantalizing promises of improved global relations, of new technologies bringing widespread prosperity, and of rational management of the earth’s resources, seem to dangle just out of reach.
Since the 1960s, ubiquitous images of our fragile planet floating in the vastness of space have
changed our consciousness—making us more cognizant of humanity’s vulnerability and interconnectedness. Technologies such as airplanes, TV, satellites, and the Internet, have expanded awareness of cultures and events across the world. We are now instantly aware of havoc wrought by hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, genocide, poverty, and AIDS. Displaced by such tragic events, or simply seeking better opportunities, increasing numbers of migrants test the hospitality of wealthy, relatively homogenous communities. As economies become more interconnected and the rate of cultural exchange increases, for better or worse, our world is shrinking.
Pursuing business as usual in this rapidly shrinking world is increasingly difficult, not least
because the planet’s climate is becoming less predictable, with the catastrophic consequences of greenhouse gas accumulation becoming bleaker and more evident daily. In addition to global warming, we are faced with unparalleled environmental challenges, such as cross-boundary water degradation and air pollution, over-fishing, declining ecosystems, and loss of biodiversity. The threats to our collective existence are quite real. Ecocide, nuclear proliferation, global terror networks, new military technologies, and the threat of pandemics remind us, as Bertrand Russell said, “it’s coexistence or no existence”. Only greater degrees of international cooperation can possibly resolve these complex dilemmas.
People’s psychological responses to a shrinking world include some mixture of fear and hope.
When fear dominates, this leads to xenophobia, retreating into protected enclaves, and projecting militaristic solutions. It can also fuel fundamentalist movements that offer reassurance and simple answers for an increasingly perplexing world. When hope is strong, people’s highest aspirations motivate them to uphold their moral responsibilities to their fellow humans and the larger community of life. Countless new cultural developments manifest the growing awareness that one’s narrow self-interest is dependent on general social and ecological interests (Ray and Anderson, 2000). In contrast to fundamentalism, many religious leaders now seek to emphasize the great humanitarian traditions of their faiths and the theological basis for tolerance and cooperation. Moreover, growing subcultures underscore the opportunity to increase quality of life, free from the domination of consumerism, creating new avenues of human exploration and contentment.
1
In developing countries this hope is expressed by communities devising new development
paradigms seeking sustainable livelihoods (Amalric, 2004). Indigenous groups, women’s place-based initiatives, worker-owned cooperatives, and community lending institutions all enhance local empowerment. In wealthier countries, these insights manifest in various lifestyle movements (e.g., voluntary simplicity, slow foods, cooperatives, ecovillages) seeking to consume less and devote more time to family, community, and personal projects. The hope of
1
See Stutz (2006) in the GTI Paper Series.
5
|
| | Authors: Kriegman, Orion. |
|
| |
|
|
Kriegman et al.
Planetary phase of history: support for the latency hypothesis
Globalization arises out of a centuries-long process that accelerated dramatically over the last
50 years. The formation of the UN, ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Accords among other landmark treaties, and development of institutions such as the International Criminal Court, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and the World Trade Organization (WTO) express the growing need to develop new forms of cooperation at the global level. Yet, the tantalizing promises of improved global relations, of new technologies bringing widespread prosperity, and of rational management of the earth’s resources, seem to dangle just out of reach.
Since the 1960s, ubiquitous images of our fragile planet floating in the vastness of space have
changed our consciousness—making us more cognizant of humanity’s vulnerability and interconnectedness. Technologies such as airplanes, TV, satellites, and the Internet, have expanded awareness of cultures and events across the world. We are now instantly aware of havoc wrought by hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, genocide, poverty, and AIDS. Displaced by such tragic events, or simply seeking better opportunities, increasing numbers of migrants test the hospitality of wealthy, relatively homogenous communities. As economies become more interconnected and the rate of cultural exchange increases, for better or worse, our world is shrinking.
Pursuing business as usual in this rapidly shrinking world is increasingly difficult, not least
because the planet’s climate is becoming less predictable, with the catastrophic consequences of greenhouse gas accumulation becoming bleaker and more evident daily. In addition to global warming, we are faced with unparalleled environmental challenges, such as cross-boundary water degradation and air pollution, over-fishing, declining ecosystems, and loss of biodiversity. The threats to our collective existence are quite real. Ecocide, nuclear proliferation, global terror networks, new military technologies, and the threat of pandemics remind us, as Bertrand Russell said, “it’s coexistence or no existence”. Only greater degrees of international cooperation can possibly resolve these complex dilemmas.
People’s psychological responses to a shrinking world include some mixture of fear and hope.
When fear dominates, this leads to xenophobia, retreating into protected enclaves, and projecting militaristic solutions. It can also fuel fundamentalist movements that offer reassurance and simple answers for an increasingly perplexing world. When hope is strong, people’s highest aspirations motivate them to uphold their moral responsibilities to their fellow humans and the larger community of life. Countless new cultural developments manifest the growing awareness that one’s narrow self-interest is dependent on general social and ecological interests (Ray and Anderson, 2000). In contrast to fundamentalism, many religious leaders now seek to emphasize the great humanitarian traditions of their faiths and the theological basis for tolerance and cooperation. Moreover, growing subcultures underscore the opportunity to increase quality of life, free from the domination of consumerism, creating new avenues of human exploration and contentment.
In developing countries this hope is expressed by communities devising new development
paradigms seeking sustainable livelihoods (Amalric, 2004). Indigenous groups, women’s place- based initiatives, worker-owned cooperatives, and community lending institutions all enhance local empowerment. In wealthier countries, these insights manifest in various lifestyle movements (e.g., voluntary simplicity, slow foods, cooperatives, ecovillages) seeking to consume less and devote more time to family, community, and personal projects. The hope of
1
See Stutz (2006) in the GTI Paper Series.
5
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|