All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Teacher Stress and its Manifestation: A Longitudinal Comparison
Unformatted Document Text:  differentiated teacher stress, page 3 Handouts will be designed that include major findings, along with two columns for notes under “Applies to My School” and “Brainstorming Change.” At two points, the audience will be asked to share what they’ve written, in order to keep the focus on practical application. At the end of the session, an electronic chat room will be established to share suggestions for using this information in participants’ own schools and settings. REFERENCES: Abidin, R.R., & Robinson, L.L. (2002). Stress, biases, or professionalism: What drives teachers’ referral judgments of students with challenging behaviors. Journal of Emotional andBehavioral Disorders, 10(4), 204-212. Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters and what leaders can do. Educational Leadersip, 60(8), 6–13. Edmondson, S.L., & Thompson, D. (2002). Burnout among special educators: A meta-analysis. In G. Gates & M. Wolverton (Eds.), Toward wellness: Prevention, coping, and stress.Greenwich CT: Information Age. Frydenberg, E. (Ed.) (2004). Thriving, surviving or going under: Coping with everyday lives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Grant, M.M., & Hill, J.R. (2006). Weighing the risks with the rewards: Implementing student- centered pedagogy within high stakes testing. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.),Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. McColl, A. (2005, April). Tough call: Is No Child Left behind constitutional? Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 604-610. Webb, P.T. (2006). The stress of accountability: Teachers as policy brokers in a poverty school. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Woods, P., & Carlyle, D. (2002). Teacher identities under stress: The emotions of separation and renewal. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 169–189.

Authors: McHardy, Robbie.
first   previous   Page 3 of 3   next   last



background image
differentiated teacher stress, page 3
Handouts will be designed that include major findings, along with two columns for notes under
“Applies to My School” and “Brainstorming Change.” At two points, the audience will be
asked to share what they’ve written, in order to keep the focus on practical application. At the
end of the session, an electronic chat room will be established to share suggestions for using this
information in participants’ own schools and settings.
REFERENCES:
Abidin, R.R., & Robinson, L.L. (2002). Stress, biases, or professionalism: What drives teachers’
referral judgments of students with challenging behaviors. Journal of Emotional and
Behavioral Disorders, 10
(4), 204-212.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters and what leaders can do.
Educational Leadersip, 60(8), 6–13.
Edmondson, S.L., & Thompson, D. (2002). Burnout among special educators: A meta-analysis.
In G. Gates & M. Wolverton (Eds.), Toward wellness: Prevention, coping, and stress.
Greenwich CT: Information Age.
Frydenberg, E. (Ed.) (2004). Thriving, surviving or going under: Coping with everyday lives.
Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Grant, M.M., & Hill, J.R. (2006). Weighing the risks with the rewards: Implementing student-
centered pedagogy within high stakes testing. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.),
Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability. Greenwich, CT:
Information Age.
McColl, A. (2005, April). Tough call: Is No Child Left behind constitutional? Phi Delta Kappan,
86, 604-610.
Webb, P.T. (2006). The stress of accountability: Teachers as policy brokers in a poverty school.
In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of
accountability.
Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Woods, P., & Carlyle, D. (2002). Teacher identities under stress: The emotions of separation and
renewal. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 169–189.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 3   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.