Author's Keywords: Land Use, Development Permits, Multi-level Analysis, Hierarchical Linear Model	Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208914_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Tavares, Antonio., Kassekert, Anthony., Feiock, Richard. and Kang, In-Sung. "Land Use Decisions and Political Institutions: A Multi-Level Analysis of City and County Choices" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-09 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208914_index.html>

Tavares, A. F., Kassekert, A. , Feiock, R. C. and Kang, I. , 2007-08-30 "Land Use Decisions and Political Institutions: A Multi-Level Analysis of City and County Choices" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-09 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p208914_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: We employ the political market framework to explain differences in local government land use decisions. This framework conceptualizes policy choices as resulting from the interplay between the aggregate policy demand by residents, developers and environmental interests and the aggregate supply by government authorities. The framework emphasizes the role of local legislative and executive institutions as mediators of local policy change. Intergovernmental variation in the level of delay imposed through the processes of development approval by city and county governments are investigated. Because county governments make land use decisions in unincorporated areas, we model these areas, as well as cities, as nested within the structure of counties. Hierarchical linear analysis of data collected in a 2007 survey of Florida city and county planners finds some support for multilevel relationships. We find that fragmentation of development interests leads to longer review times.

National Interests and the Development of the European Union's CFSP and ESDP: The Role of Domestic Political Preferences in Selecting the Level of Action and Institutions for Advancing Foreign and Defense Policy

Political Institutions and Land Use Regulation at affordable housing; Multi-Level Analysis of city and county

Political Institutions and Land Use Decisions: A Multi-Level Analysis of Local Land Use Policy Choices