Author's Keywords: American Empire, Empire, American Grand Strategy, Hierarchy, International Relations Theory	Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210116_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Nexon, Daniel. "Beyond the "Lessons of Empire"" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210116_index.html>

Nexon, D. H. , 2007-08-30 "Beyond the "Lessons of Empire"" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210116_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: How should we make sense of the geostrategic position occupied by the United States? Many view the United States as a unipolar power: a great power that lacks any �peer competitors� capable of directly challenging its position of preeminence. Others treat the United States as a hegemonic power that establishes and enforces broad �rules of the game� that govern relations among other states. Some describe the United States, in contrast, as an informal empire that shapes not only the interactions among other states but also their internal political organization. They argue that American policymakers �cannot ignore the lessons and analogies of imperial history� (Cohen, 2004: 56) and that �an understanding of America as an evolving, if reluctant, modern empire is an important analytic tool with profound consequences that American leaders should understand� (Simes, 2003: 93). I agree that attention to the dynamics of past empires sheds light on contemporary American foreign-policy dilemmas (see, e.g., MacDonald, 2006; Nexon and Wright, 2007). But I think we should exercise caution about what �lessons of empire� we identify for the United States. Three considerations motivate my concerns. First, historical empires display tremendous variation in their political structures, forms of rule, and legitimating principles. Second, some empires also operated as preeminent powers in unipolar systems, hegemonic political communities, or both. But others operated as one great power among many or even as decidedly minor players in international politics (see Howe, 2002). Third, although analysts provide a sharp analytical distinction between �hegemony� and �empire,� the practices of hegemonic control almost invariably bleed into those of informal empire (Doyle, 1986: 38-45; Lake, 1996: 9). I start with a critical analysis of the American Empire debate. I next put forth an ideal-typical model of empires and their dynamics. I conclude by reflecting on the degree of American informal empire. However we resolve this debate, it calls attention to the broader task of understanding the �micropolitics of international hierarchy�: how many of the strategic dilemmas of great powers involve the interplay between their asymmetric relations with other states and those states� �internal� political dynamics.

Core � Periphery Relations and federal State-Building in American political development

Delegated Empire: Information, Networks, and Political Control of the American Colonial State in the Philippines, 1900-1913

The 'Debate about Empire' and International Relations Theory: Beyond the Narratives of Sovereign and Imperial Power in Theorizing Modern World Politics

The 'Debate About Empire' and International Relations Theory; Beyond the Narratives of Sovereign and Imperial Power in Theorizing Modern World Politics