|
|
|
|
Voters Like Me: Domestic Migration and Proximity to Shared Ideology |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Is domestic migration a contributing factor in the rise of party polarization at the national level in U.S. politics? Potentially, migration could be powerful enough to reconstitute significant portions of the overall electorate. At the same time, the effects of migration may offset each other, and its magnitude in any given year, and in comparison to postwar years, can seem surprisingly small. In this study, I examine microdata samples from the 2000 U.S. Census and the 2000 National Election Survey, and apply three tests to see if the results are consistent with the thesis that migration tended to homogenize preferences within U.S. congressional districts during the 1990’s. If this thesis holds, migration during this time sorted preferences geographically, rather than dispersing them, and led to more homogeneous constituencies more likely to be dominated by one ideological pole. Specifically, I find a positive and monotonic relationship between growths of congressional districts and support for George Bush in the 2000 presidential election and higher DW-NOMINATE first dimension scores. However, each dataset and the tests applied are constrained by the lack of complete individual level data describing migration and its political consequences. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
migrant (129), migrat (86), district (86), state (69), bush (65), 1 (60), polit (52), sort (50), congression (48), 2 (46), support (45), 2000 (44), growth (41), non (41), prefer (41), individu (35), effect (34), new (33), mean (33), respond (31), puma (31), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| McDonald, Ian. "Voters Like Me: Domestic Migration and Proximity to Shared Ideology" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210466_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| McDonald, I. , 2007-08-30 "Voters Like Me: Domestic Migration and Proximity to Shared Ideology" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210466_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Is domestic migration a contributing factor in the rise of party polarization at the national level in U.S. politics? Potentially, migration could be powerful enough to reconstitute significant portions of the overall electorate. At the same time, the effects of migration may offset each other, and its magnitude in any given year, and in comparison to postwar years, can seem surprisingly small. In this study, I examine microdata samples from the 2000 U.S. Census and the 2000 National Election Survey, and apply three tests to see if the results are consistent with the thesis that migration tended to homogenize preferences within U.S. congressional districts during the 1990’s. If this thesis holds, migration during this time sorted preferences geographically, rather than dispersing them, and led to more homogeneous constituencies more likely to be dominated by one ideological pole. Specifically, I find a positive and monotonic relationship between growths of congressional districts and support for George Bush in the 2000 presidential election and higher DW-NOMINATE first dimension scores. However, each dataset and the tests applied are constrained by the lack of complete individual level data describing migration and its political consequences. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
38 |
| Word count: |
8703 |
| Text sample: |
| Voters Like Us: Domestic Migration and Geographic Sorting in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Ian McDonald Duke University Box 90204 Durham NC 27708 Email: ian.mcdonald@duke.edu Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL September 1 2007 Abstract: Is domestic migration a contributing factor in the rise of party polarization at the national level in U.S. politics? Potentially migration could be powerful enough to reconstitute significant portions of the overall electorate. At the same time |
| 104 267 Colorado 3 679 020 103 726 Oregon 1 692 399 102 783 Virginia 10 731 109 102 678 Colorado 2 656 148 102 476 Florida 15 680 417 102 112 Delaware At-large 732 378 101 461 South Carolina 2 682 961 101 247 Florida 9 681 833 101 056 Data provided from 2000 U.S. Census at http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html 38 |
Similar Titles:
The Role of Geography in State Support for Non-state Armed Groups (NAGs): Beyond Random Effect
Presidential Politics in a Red State: The Effect of Watching the State of the Union in Bush Country
The Effect of Concurrent Congressional and Presidential Elections: District Level Relative Vote and Presidential Support in Congress
|
|