|
|
|
|
Thatcher and the National Health Service: Belief Cascades, Heresthetics, and Institutional Change |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Why is health care reform so difficult politically? One prominent explanation holds that its the institutions, stupid! What then can the literature on institutional change tell us about health care reform? Drawing on the notion of belief cascades, we argue that various crises in the health care can challenge the beliefs that support and maintain a given institutional arrangement, and that the resulting quandary creates the possibility of triggering a belief cascade that results in institutional change. We demonstrate how the advent of long waiting lists within the British National Health Service (NHS) created just such a quandary about a system that was widely supported while at the same time widely criticized in regards to its provision of service. We further show how Thatcher was able to engage in a heresthetical maneuver that depicted the waitlists as resulting from inefficiencies within the NHS, and not a lack of resources (e.g., insufficient money, physicians, nurses, or hospitals). In doing so, she was able to trigger a belief cascade that supported the introduction of a previously unviable feature, namely an internal market within the NHS. We also show that the advent of the waitlists did not directly challenge the strongly held belief that the NHS should remain public, and therefore did not allow for the complete privatization of the Service as some had hoped. We generalize our findings by arguing that such crises and quandaries are likely to emerge in the near future as the baby-boomers age, putting increases pressure on already strained health care systems. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
nhs (119), health (72), servic (63), care (49), wait (48), thatcher (47), patient (46), reform (46), govern (44), institut (41), would (40), chang (37), hospit (36), 1 (35), polit (35), time (32), list (30), quandari (29), belief (28), labour (28), increas (28), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Hasselmann, Chris. and Park, David. "Thatcher and the National Health Service: Belief Cascades, Heresthetics, and Institutional Change" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-09 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210789_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Hasselmann, C. and Park, D. K. , 2007-08-30 "Thatcher and the National Health Service: Belief Cascades, Heresthetics, and Institutional Change" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-09 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p210789_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Why is health care reform so difficult politically? One prominent explanation holds that its the institutions, stupid! What then can the literature on institutional change tell us about health care reform? Drawing on the notion of belief cascades, we argue that various crises in the health care can challenge the beliefs that support and maintain a given institutional arrangement, and that the resulting quandary creates the possibility of triggering a belief cascade that results in institutional change. We demonstrate how the advent of long waiting lists within the British National Health Service (NHS) created just such a quandary about a system that was widely supported while at the same time widely criticized in regards to its provision of service. We further show how Thatcher was able to engage in a heresthetical maneuver that depicted the waitlists as resulting from inefficiencies within the NHS, and not a lack of resources (e.g., insufficient money, physicians, nurses, or hospitals). In doing so, she was able to trigger a belief cascade that supported the introduction of a previously unviable feature, namely an internal market within the NHS. We also show that the advent of the waitlists did not directly challenge the strongly held belief that the NHS should remain public, and therefore did not allow for the complete privatization of the Service as some had hoped. We generalize our findings by arguing that such crises and quandaries are likely to emerge in the near future as the baby-boomers age, putting increases pressure on already strained health care systems. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
35 |
| Word count: |
11219 |
| Text sample: |
| Thatcher and the National Health Service: belief cascades heresthetics and institutional change. Chris Hasselmann Graduate School of Public and International Affairs University of Pittsburgh hasselm@pitt.edu and David K. Park Department of Political Science George Washington University dkp@gwu.edu Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL August 30 2007 Why is health care reform so difficult politically? One prominent explanation holds that “it’s the institutions stupid!” What then can the literature on institutional change tell |
| in need of improvement that the problem was amenable to government intervention and that the management of the Service itself was increasingly in question. For example in 1986 the difference among likely Alliance voters who felt that a government could improve the HSS (85%) and that the NHS was well run (34%) produced a quandary measuring 51% on this scale. The results are reported for the two main parties and the Alliance which compromised the Liberals and Social Democratic |
Similar Titles:
Health Care Reform, Public Health and Institutional Change
Evaluating Grand Claims in Oregon Health Care Reform via the Health Services Commission: Deliberative Democracy or ‘Normal Politics?’
|
|