|
|
|
|
Thank You, Paul Jacob: State Legislative Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
After an unusually swift reform movement in the 1990s, 15 states are now adjusting to the most significant institutional change in state government in a generation—legislative term limits. Beyond presenting political scientists with the basic task of identifying and cataloging its wide variety of substantive impacts, this reform provides scholars with an unprecedented opportunity to test and extend legislative theory. Most legislative theory is supported by behavioral assumptions that term limits appear to threaten. In particular, the assumption that legislators are driven by a re-election motivation is the foundation of both most positive and more informal explanations of the legislative process. This assumption must be modified—if not rejected completely—in the presence of term limits, giving a unique opportunity to test these theories. I describe some of the benefits of using term limits to test and extend legislative theory by reviewing the existing literature on the subject. In the process, I also highlight term limits’ exceptional methodological advantages for theory testing (exogeneity, strong research designs, and significant variation on the causal variable) and explicate the potential causal mechanisms at work with the reform. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
term (255), limit (255), legisl (225), state (187), polit (129), effect (98), studi (95), 2007 (71), na (66), theori (64), legislatur (64), reform (57), test (54), 2006 (49), institut (49), impact (46), polici (45), john (44), quarter (44), 1 (44), 2004 (44), |
Author's Keywords:
|
term limits, state legislatures, state politics, institutions, review essay |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Mooney, Christopher. "Thank You, Paul Jacob: State Legislative Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211029_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Mooney, C. Z. , 2007-08-30 "Thank You, Paul Jacob: State Legislative Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211029_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: After an unusually swift reform movement in the 1990s, 15 states are now adjusting to the most significant institutional change in state government in a generation—legislative term limits. Beyond presenting political scientists with the basic task of identifying and cataloging its wide variety of substantive impacts, this reform provides scholars with an unprecedented opportunity to test and extend legislative theory. Most legislative theory is supported by behavioral assumptions that term limits appear to threaten. In particular, the assumption that legislators are driven by a re-election motivation is the foundation of both most positive and more informal explanations of the legislative process. This assumption must be modified—if not rejected completely—in the presence of term limits, giving a unique opportunity to test these theories. I describe some of the benefits of using term limits to test and extend legislative theory by reviewing the existing literature on the subject. In the process, I also highlight term limits’ exceptional methodological advantages for theory testing (exogeneity, strong research designs, and significant variation on the causal variable) and explicate the potential causal mechanisms at work with the reform. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
48 |
| Word count: |
13413 |
| Text sample: |
| Thank You Paul Jacob: Term Limits as a Boon to Legislative Scholarship Christopher Z. Mooney Institute of Government and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Springfield Email: cmoon1@uis.edu Prepared for presentation at the 2007 meetings of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL. Abstract After an unusually swift reform movement in the 1990s 15 states are now adjusting to the most significant institutional change in state government in a generation—legislative term limits. Beyond presenting political scientists with the basic |
| party (% Democrat in 2007) m 40.0 45.7 .82 N 35 15 Note: * Difference-of-means p-values were generated using the small-sample pooled-s method. Using the large-sample test two p-values were less than .25—for per capita population (p=.10) and conservatism (p=.16). Sources: a Hovey and Hovey 2007 18. b Hovey and Hovey 2007 27. c Hovey and Hovey 2007 30. d Hovey and Hovey 2007 46. e Hovey and Hovey 2007 45 f Erikson Wright and McIver 2006 g Infoplease |
Similar Titles:
Once Reformed, Soon Forgotten: The Impact of Limiting State Legislative Terms of Service on Voter Turnout in Intra-Party Contests
The Effects of State Level Term Limits on _x000d_Female State Legislators’ Political Ambitions
The Causes and Consequences of Time Legislators Spend Fundraising for Themselves and for their Caucuses: Modeling Effects of Institutional Design and Personal and Political Context in State Legislatures
|
|