Citation

Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Examines the problem of judgment and the question of value pluralism in the political liberalism of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

polit (255), reason (186), public (140), truth (123), liber (120), claim (116), rawl (108), valu (89), view (66), comprehens (63), judgment (61), right (56), doctrin (53), nussbaum (52), would (52), concept (50), douglass (49), one (47), make (46), practic (42), equal (42),

Author's Keywords:

political liberalism, judgment, truth
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211116_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Zerilli, Linda. "Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211116_index.html>

APA Citation:

Zerilli, L. M. , 2007-08-30 "Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211116_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Examines the problem of judgment and the question of value pluralism in the political liberalism of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 56
Word count: 18112
Text sample:
Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment Linda M. G. Zerilli Department of Political Science Northwestern University (2006/07) Stanford Humanities Center Fellow (This essay is part of a book-in-progress: Toward a Democratic Theory of Judgment. Please do not circulate or cite. Thanks to Mary Dietz Gregor Gnädig Troy Jollimore and George Shulman and for their comments.) 1 Posing the question “Is multiculturalism bad for women? ” Susan Okin delivers a resounding “yes.”1 Okin’s 1997 essay which initiated a lively
the disenfranchisement of women and Blacks was also once considered voluntary not to mention slaves’ subservience to their masters. 65 I discuss this in Zerilli Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom ch. 4. 66 Although I am unable to dwell on Weber in this context I would say that it is deeply mistaken to interpret his account of values as if he thought of them as absolute as final stands that were beyond our critical judgment as values which


Similar Titles:
What Would Barthes Make of This? On Viewing Practices and an Unconventional Photography Project

Liberalism, Value Pluralism, and a Meaningful and Equal Right of Exit for All

Public Reason versus the Sympathetic Spectator: John Rawls and Adam Smith on Legitimate Political Speech

Rawls' Political Conception of Justice: Is it as Stable for Liberalism as Locke's Law of Nature?


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.