Citation

Dealing with a Nuclear North Korea: Is There a Future for the Six-Party Talks?

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Over the past decade, multiple attempts have been made to curb North Korea’s development of a nuclear program. As such, main powers such as the United States and China have reached out to Pyongyang through bilateral as well as multilateral negotiation processes. The Six-Party Talks, the current mechanism used to discuss options for a potential denuclearization of the Korea peninsula, has brought back hope that a potential deal might, one day, be reached. What type of framework is the Six-Party Talks? Can it be considered a true neo-liberal institution? And how have parties’ negotiation behaviors been influence by, and have influenced the process? This paper looks at the Six-Party Talks’ previous and current rounds, and argues that though the process has not yet emerged as a successful example of an institution that can influence North Korea’s determination to be a nuclear power, it has however left its embryonic stage to now be able to be considered a viable process that parties have used as an integral part of their foreign policy.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

north (255), korea (255), talk (238), parti (212), six (144), state (129), six-parti (128), negoti (112), nuclear (104), unit (93), also (75), would (59), korean (56), china (53), round (53), process (51), time (48), 2005 (48), august (47), south (47), pyongyang (44),

Author's Keywords:

North Korea, Six-Party Talks, Negotiation, Denuclearization, Foreign Policy, Neo-liberal Institution
Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211248_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Grzelczyk, Virginie. "Dealing with a Nuclear North Korea: Is There a Future for the Six-Party Talks?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211248_index.html>

APA Citation:

Grzelczyk, V. , 2007-08-30 "Dealing with a Nuclear North Korea: Is There a Future for the Six-Party Talks?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211248_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Over the past decade, multiple attempts have been made to curb North Korea’s development of a nuclear program. As such, main powers such as the United States and China have reached out to Pyongyang through bilateral as well as multilateral negotiation processes. The Six-Party Talks, the current mechanism used to discuss options for a potential denuclearization of the Korea peninsula, has brought back hope that a potential deal might, one day, be reached. What type of framework is the Six-Party Talks? Can it be considered a true neo-liberal institution? And how have parties’ negotiation behaviors been influence by, and have influenced the process? This paper looks at the Six-Party Talks’ previous and current rounds, and argues that though the process has not yet emerged as a successful example of an institution that can influence North Korea’s determination to be a nuclear power, it has however left its embryonic stage to now be able to be considered a viable process that parties have used as an integral part of their foreign policy.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 25
Word count: 14018
Text sample:
Dealing with a Nuclear North Korea: Is there a future for the Six-Party Talks? Dr. Virginie Grzelczyk Virginie.Grzelczyk@gmail.com Prepared for delivery at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 30 - September 2 2007. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. DRAFT – PLEASE ASK FOR PERMISSION TO CITE Abstract: Over the past decade multiple attempts have been made to curb North Korea’s development of a nuclear program. As such main powers such as the
moving to a possible agreement ” February 9 2007. 144 Reuters “Accord elusive at North Korea nuclear talks ” February 11 2007. 145 The New York Times “Nuclear Talks on North Korea Hit Roadblock ” February 12 2007 146 Xinhua General News Service “ROK official: six-party talks may extend to Tuesday ” February 12 2007. 147 Xinhua General News Service “Six-party talks end with joint document ” February 13 2007. 148 The New York Times “Key Points of N.


Similar Titles:
Interest and Identity in Foreign Policy: China in the Six-Party Talks on North Korean Nuclear Issue

Japanese Public Perceptions of China, the United States, South Korea, Russia and North Korea

The wizard of negotiations ?! : The negotiating patterns of North Korea at the Six-party talks


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.