|
|
|
|
Caught Between Behavior and Identity: Nuclear Dilemma between North Korea and the United States |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
At the heart of the security dilemma are two types of interactivity: the interactive nature of security action and reaction between two concerned parties; and the malicious interactivity between behavioral consequences and identity effects of security measures. While most scholars recognize the vicious cycle of security action and reaction as constituting the security dilemma, they fail to understand that the vicious cycle is created only when there is a malign interactivity between behavioral consequences and identity effects of security measures. In general terms, state actors transform uncertainty in international politics into a set of ordered possibilities by choosing among a repertoire of social devices, such as social rules, norms, identities, or institutions, in order to devise simple rules of behavior that enable them to make decision with regard to the future. While the transformation process can take a multitude of forms, reflecting the diversity in the social devices from which they can choose, the security dilemma is constituted by the type of interactions where antagonistic identity replaces or reduces uncertainty about behavior in such a way as to exacerbate enmity. Only when social interactions between countries are characterized by 1) truncated understanding of dynamic interactions, 2) antagonistic identity, and 3) identity blaming, do social effects and behavioral consequences multiply each other in a malign way, constituting the security dilemma. This paper analyzes the North Korean nuclear crisis as an empirical case that reveals the dimension of the security dilemma logic overlooked in IR theories and that illuminates the negative feedback between behavior and identity constituting the core mechanism of the security dilemma. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
secur (173), state (163), north (162), ident (152), nuclear (111), dilemma (107), pyongyang (87), korea (86), behavior (79), washington (63), interact (56), way (52), action (51), weapon (49), korean (48), one (47), understand (46), social (45), unit (45), move (44), polit (43), |
Author's Keywords:
|
security dilemma, identity, behavior, uncertainty, constructivism, realism, North Korea, nuclear proliferation |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Suh, Jae-Jung. "Caught Between Behavior and Identity: Nuclear Dilemma between North Korea and the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211348_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Suh, J. , 2007-08-30 "Caught Between Behavior and Identity: Nuclear Dilemma between North Korea and the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211348_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: At the heart of the security dilemma are two types of interactivity: the interactive nature of security action and reaction between two concerned parties; and the malicious interactivity between behavioral consequences and identity effects of security measures. While most scholars recognize the vicious cycle of security action and reaction as constituting the security dilemma, they fail to understand that the vicious cycle is created only when there is a malign interactivity between behavioral consequences and identity effects of security measures. In general terms, state actors transform uncertainty in international politics into a set of ordered possibilities by choosing among a repertoire of social devices, such as social rules, norms, identities, or institutions, in order to devise simple rules of behavior that enable them to make decision with regard to the future. While the transformation process can take a multitude of forms, reflecting the diversity in the social devices from which they can choose, the security dilemma is constituted by the type of interactions where antagonistic identity replaces or reduces uncertainty about behavior in such a way as to exacerbate enmity. Only when social interactions between countries are characterized by 1) truncated understanding of dynamic interactions, 2) antagonistic identity, and 3) identity blaming, do social effects and behavioral consequences multiply each other in a malign way, constituting the security dilemma. This paper analyzes the North Korean nuclear crisis as an empirical case that reveals the dimension of the security dilemma logic overlooked in IR theories and that illuminates the negative feedback between behavior and identity constituting the core mechanism of the security dilemma. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
47 |
| Word count: |
17782 |
| Text sample: |
| Caught between Behavior and Identity: Nuclear Dilemma between North Korea and the United States Abstract: At the heart of the security dilemma are two types of interactivity: the interactive nature of security action and reaction between two concerned parties; and the malicious interactivity between behavioral consequences and identity effects of security measures. While most scholars recognize the vicious cycle of security action and reaction as constituting the security dilemma they fail to understand that the vicious cycle is created |
| of a combination of economic assistance and security assurance in exchange for North Korea’s giving up its weapons of mass destruction see Richard L. Armitage A Comprehensive Approach to North Korea (Washington D.C.: National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies 1999); Michael Armacost Daneil I. Okimoto and Gi-Wook Shin Addressing the North Korean Nuclear Challenge Asia/Pacific Research Center Institute for International Studies Stanford University April 15 2003; and Michael J. Mazarr "Going Just a Little Nuclear: Nonproliferation Lessons |
Similar Titles:
The Social Construction of Intercultural Identity of being Korean in the United States: An analysis of the influence of communicative interactions on identities of Korean-American students.
Analogies and the Security Dilemma: How the Social Construction of Antagonistic Relations between Washington and Pyongyang Has Turned US-North Korean Interaction in Self-Replicating Mutual Hostility
The 1994 Nuclear Crisis: A Comparative Study of Structural Realist and Constructivist Approaches to Understanding the US-North Korean Security Dilemma
|
|