|
|
|
|
Defining Social Cohesion in Diverse Societies: A Durkheim-based Analysis of Trust and Normative Consensus in Ethnically Diverse Societies |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In recent years, the relation between social cohesion and ethnic and cultural diversity has been hotly debated in political science and in society in general. The general assumption in this literature is that (increasing) ethnic diversity is detrimental for the development of social cohesion, as it inhibits the creation of social capital. Generalized trust is believed to prosper most abundantly in homogenous settings. There is indeed some empirical evidence, suggesting that ethnic diversity reduces trust levels within society. If this is the case, this is indeed a reason for concern as we know that societies with high levels of social capital and generalized can function in a more effective manner than societies where this is not the case.
In this paper, we do not wish to go into this empirical discussion. Rather, we want to take a step back and study the concepts of social capital and social cohesion in a more theoretically informed manner. Despite the fact that ‘social cohesion’ is a key term in a lot of current research, the concept is seldom defined. Our analysis of the concept of social cohesion builds on the work of the French sociologist Emile Durkheim. Already in 1893, Durkheim argued that various forms of society will develop their distinct concepts of cohesion and trust. While pre-modern societies were based on mechanic forms of solidarity, modern societies require organic solidarity, Durkheim argued. The theoretically relevant question is now whether we can take Durkheim’s argument a step further by considering what kind of solidarity is essential for the cohesion of contemporary, ‘post-modern’, or at least ethnically diverse societies? In these societies one can no longer assume that a normative consensus is present and offers a building stone for social cohesion. The question we would like to explore is what kind of functional equivalence for a normative consensus is available in such a diverse setting? |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
social (255), trust (255), cohes (173), societi (169), general (85), divers (83), p (67), pp (50), capit (47), state (46), relat (45), high (44), polit (43), individu (42), concept (41), compon (41), order (37), research (37), quit (36), level (36), seem (36), |
Author's Keywords:
|
social cohesion, generalized trust, Durkheim, diversity, multiculturalism |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Reeskens, Tim. "Defining Social Cohesion in Diverse Societies: A Durkheim-based Analysis of Trust and Normative Consensus in Ethnically Diverse Societies" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211577_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Reeskens, T. , 2007-08-30 "Defining Social Cohesion in Diverse Societies: A Durkheim-based Analysis of Trust and Normative Consensus in Ethnically Diverse Societies" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211577_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: In recent years, the relation between social cohesion and ethnic and cultural diversity has been hotly debated in political science and in society in general. The general assumption in this literature is that (increasing) ethnic diversity is detrimental for the development of social cohesion, as it inhibits the creation of social capital. Generalized trust is believed to prosper most abundantly in homogenous settings. There is indeed some empirical evidence, suggesting that ethnic diversity reduces trust levels within society. If this is the case, this is indeed a reason for concern as we know that societies with high levels of social capital and generalized can function in a more effective manner than societies where this is not the case.
In this paper, we do not wish to go into this empirical discussion. Rather, we want to take a step back and study the concepts of social capital and social cohesion in a more theoretically informed manner. Despite the fact that ‘social cohesion’ is a key term in a lot of current research, the concept is seldom defined. Our analysis of the concept of social cohesion builds on the work of the French sociologist Emile Durkheim. Already in 1893, Durkheim argued that various forms of society will develop their distinct concepts of cohesion and trust. While pre-modern societies were based on mechanic forms of solidarity, modern societies require organic solidarity, Durkheim argued. The theoretically relevant question is now whether we can take Durkheim’s argument a step further by considering what kind of solidarity is essential for the cohesion of contemporary, ‘post-modern’, or at least ethnically diverse societies? In these societies one can no longer assume that a normative consensus is present and offers a building stone for social cohesion. The question we would like to explore is what kind of functional equivalence for a normative consensus is available in such a diverse setting? |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
35 |
| Word count: |
13784 |
| Text sample: |
| Tim Reeskens Centre for Political Research KU Leuven Parkstraat 45 Box 3602 B-3000 Leuven Tim.Reeskens@soc.kuleuven.be Defining Social Cohesion in Diverse Societies A Durkheimian-based Analysis of Trust and Normative Consensus in Ethnically Diverse Societies Very first draft – suggestions are welcome! Abstract: According to Kenneth Newton generalized trust serves as the most important element in the concept of social capital. Moreover according to Forrest and Kearns social capital is the key dimension of social cohesion. Applying basic logical inference one |
| The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Uslaner E. (2007). Does Diversity Drive Down Trust? Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions May 7-12 Helsinki. Waldrauch H. (2005). Electoral Rights for Foreign Nationals: A Comparative Overview. Paper presented at “Citizens Non-Citizens and Voting Rights in Europe ” June 2-5 University of Edinburgh. Walzer M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books. Weber M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline in |
Similar Titles:
Social Capital and Political Participation in America: An Individual or Group Level Relationship?
Communism Durability and The Connection between Social Ties and Political Institutions –Evidence from state-society relations in Rural China and Vietnam
How Political Institutions Create and Destroy Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust
|
|