Citation

E-Rulemaking and Environmental Policy,

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Public opinion influences the outcome of the rulemaking process through the procedural requirements that the Administrative Procedure Act imposes upon agencies. This introduces a dilemma into the regulatory arena that has troubled democratic theory: reconciling the norms of equality and representation with the reality of unequal participation. The opportunities for public participation in rulemaking was enhanced with the federal E-Government Act of 2002. This study examines changes made to 56 proposed rules by the US Environmental Protection Agency in response to public comments over the decade that the agency began to solicit comments through electronic dockets. The analysis finds that comments by regulated industries greatly outnumber those from other individuals and groups. While still at unequal levels, there has been an increase in participation by private citizens in the notice-and-comment process, which traditionally has been dominated by industry voices. The probability of a proposed rule being weakened decreases as the proportion of private citizen and environmental group comments rise in relation to industry comments.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

comment (134), rule (87), propos (77), rulemak (61), group (55), standard (50), industri (47), agenc (47), public (46), chang (44), e (43), citizen (43), particip (37), case (35), regul (34), environment (34), interest (32), epa (32), number (30), privat (30), emiss (27),
Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211731_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Shafie, David. "E-Rulemaking and Environmental Policy," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211731_index.html>

APA Citation:

Shafie, D. M. , 2007-08-30 "E-Rulemaking and Environmental Policy," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211731_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Public opinion influences the outcome of the rulemaking process through the procedural requirements that the Administrative Procedure Act imposes upon agencies. This introduces a dilemma into the regulatory arena that has troubled democratic theory: reconciling the norms of equality and representation with the reality of unequal participation. The opportunities for public participation in rulemaking was enhanced with the federal E-Government Act of 2002. This study examines changes made to 56 proposed rules by the US Environmental Protection Agency in response to public comments over the decade that the agency began to solicit comments through electronic dockets. The analysis finds that comments by regulated industries greatly outnumber those from other individuals and groups. While still at unequal levels, there has been an increase in participation by private citizens in the notice-and-comment process, which traditionally has been dominated by industry voices. The probability of a proposed rule being weakened decreases as the proportion of private citizen and environmental group comments rise in relation to industry comments.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 29
Word count: 7286
Text sample:
E-Rulemaking and Environmental Policy 1996-2006 David M. Shafie shafie@chapman.edu Dept. of Political Science Chapman University Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30 - Sep. 2 2007 Chicago. ABSTRACT Public opinion influences the outcome of the rulemaking process through the procedural requirements that the Administrative Procedure Act imposes upon agencies. This introduces a dilemma into the regulatory arena that has troubled democratic theory: reconcil ng the norms of i equality and representation
Pollutants from Area Sources 2006 Notes iThe Act required that all 247 air quality control regions be in compliance with the national standards by 1982. Carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions were to be cut by 90 percent by 1975 mainly through required pollution control equipment on new automobiles. Nitrogen oxide emissions were to be cut 90 percent by 1976. The Act was so ambitious that there was some doubt about the achievability of its goals. iiEnvironmental groups submitted comments


Similar Titles:
Between Commenting and Negotiation: The Contours of Public Participation in Agency Rulemaking

The Hidden Politics of Regulation: Interest Group Influence in Agency Rule Development

Public Participation and Bureaucratic Decision-Making: Citizen Groups and the Environmental Protection Agency

Changing the Rules: Interest Groups and Federal Environmental Rulemaking

Public and Private Regulation of Organ Transplantation: Liver Allocation and the Final Rule


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.