|
|
|
|
Federalized Party Systems: Patterns of Competition and Hegemony |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Abstract: Comparative scholarship on political parties conceives of party systems nationally. This has created a situation of conceptual and measurement incompleteness has erased subnational party competition from the conceptual mapping of party politics. We introduce the concept of “federalized party systems” to denote party systems composed of national and subnational party subsystems, the latter possessing all the properties normally attributed to “systems.” We argue that subnational party systems shape power not only in local politics, but, through their interaction the national party system, in the federalized party system as a whole. The value of this reconceptualization will be demonstrated by comparative analyses of national and subnational party competition in selected federalized polities. This will be followed by an in-depth empirical analysis of Argentina’s federalized party system that will reveal dynamics of change as well as coexistence and interaction between competitive and non-competitive party systems within Argentina’s federalized polity. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
system (255), parti (255), nation (132), polit (125), subnat (116), competit (100), feder (98), provinci (90), elector (64), elect (63), state (63), provinc (63), pattern (57), peronist (47), seat (45), vote (44), percent (43), measur (40), local (38), argentina (37), level (37), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Gibson, Edward. and Suarez-Cao, Julieta. "Federalized Party Systems: Patterns of Competition and Hegemony" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL, Aug 30, 2007 <Not Available>. 2011-06-08 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211878_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Gibson, E. and Suarez-Cao, J. , 2007-08-30 "Federalized Party Systems: Patterns of Competition and Hegemony" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2011-06-08 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211878_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Abstract: Comparative scholarship on political parties conceives of party systems nationally. This has created a situation of conceptual and measurement incompleteness has erased subnational party competition from the conceptual mapping of party politics. We introduce the concept of “federalized party systems” to denote party systems composed of national and subnational party subsystems, the latter possessing all the properties normally attributed to “systems.” We argue that subnational party systems shape power not only in local politics, but, through their interaction the national party system, in the federalized party system as a whole. The value of this reconceptualization will be demonstrated by comparative analyses of national and subnational party competition in selected federalized polities. This will be followed by an in-depth empirical analysis of Argentina’s federalized party system that will reveal dynamics of change as well as coexistence and interaction between competitive and non-competitive party systems within Argentina’s federalized polity. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
30 |
| Word count: |
12482 |
| Text sample: |
| Competition and Power in Federalized Party Systems Edward L. Gibson Associate Professor Northwestern University Department of Political Science egibson@northwestern.edu Julieta Suarez-Cao Ph.D. Candidate Northwestern University Department of Political Science jsc@northwestern.edu Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 29-Septemeber 1 2007 Chicago IL Abstract: Comparative scholarship on political parties conceives of party systems nationally. This has created a situation of conceptual and measurement incompleteness has erased subnational party competition from the conceptual mapping of |
| and Comparative Perspectives. In Federalism and Democracy in Latin America ed. Edward L. Gibson. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Suarez-Cao Julieta. 2001. “Arquitectura Institucional del Legislativo: los Casos de San Luis y Tucuman.” Paper delivered at the XXIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Washington DC September 6-8. Taagepera Rein and Matthew Shugart. 1993. “Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger's Mechanical Effect.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 455-64. Ware Alan. 1996. |
Similar Titles:
Party Voting in the US Federal System: Does the National Political Context Matter for State Level Elections?
Electoral Accountability in a Federal System: National and Provincial Economic Voting in Canada
|
|
