Citation

“I Don’t Buy It.” Investigating the Jury Deliberation Process.

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles



Abstract:

How do juries come to a decision? Previous research has focused on guilty versus non-guilty factions, individual difference variables, and context variables to explain juries’ verdicts. This study analyzed the deliberation of 12 mock juries following the problem-solving stage model. Jury deliberations were tape-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Results showed that a) problem-solving theory is useful in analyzing jury deliberations, b) 40% of jury’s statements were personal opinions and experiences, c) the total number of statements in a jury deliberation and specific stages were related to juries’ decisions. In sum, the deliberation process influenced the jury’s final decisions.
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Psychology - Law Society
URL:
http://www.ap-ls.org/


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p229197_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Güss, C. Dominik., Torres, M. Florencia., Burgos, Michelle. and Foley, Linda. "“I Don’t Buy It.” Investigating the Jury Deliberation Process." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL, Mar 05, 2008 <Not Available>. 2013-12-15 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p229197_index.html>

APA Citation:

Güss, C. , Torres, M. , Burgos, M. M. and Foley, L. , 2008-03-05 "“I Don’t Buy It.” Investigating the Jury Deliberation Process." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, Jacksonville, FL <Not Available>. 2013-12-15 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p229197_index.html

Publication Type: Poster
Abstract: How do juries come to a decision? Previous research has focused on guilty versus non-guilty factions, individual difference variables, and context variables to explain juries’ verdicts. This study analyzed the deliberation of 12 mock juries following the problem-solving stage model. Jury deliberations were tape-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Results showed that a) problem-solving theory is useful in analyzing jury deliberations, b) 40% of jury’s statements were personal opinions and experiences, c) the total number of statements in a jury deliberation and specific stages were related to juries’ decisions. In sum, the deliberation process influenced the jury’s final decisions.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Psychology - Law Society


Similar Titles:
The Micro Processes of Citizen Jury Deliberation: Implications for Deliberative Democracy

Japan's Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems as Agents of Social Change: Decolonial Strategies of Deliberative Participatory Democracy

The Transformative Potential of Ombud Processes: the Canadian Correctional Investigator Investigated.

Investigating Predictors of Preferences for Deliberative Qualities of Political Conversations Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.