All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

American Government Across Time, Space, and Location
Unformatted Document Text:  21 Cognitive Pre Score 1.299 .740 .060 1.755 . 080 Time (took class in Fall) -.140 .270 -.018 -.519 . 604 Space (took class online) -.090 .438 -007 -.206 . 837 Location (took class at JALC) .395 .300 .047 1.315 . 189 F = 78.072, p <.01; Adjusted R 2 = .432. Table 3 presents findings from the multiple regression analysis of the post internal efficacy scores. The adjusted R 2 of .432 indicates that this model explains about 43% of the variance in the post internal political efficacy. Furthermore, the probability of the F value of 78.072 for this model is less than the alpha level of .01. Therefore, the null hypothesis that the combined effects of prior internal political efficacy, cognitive pre score, time, space, and location is equal to zero must be rejected. A significant amount of variation in the post political knowledge percentage is explained by this model. Table 3 illustrates that post internal political efficacy will increase 1.299 for each unit change in prior internal political efficacy, holding constant all other variables in this model. Upon examining the significance associated with obtaining the t value (19.513) for this coefficient, the null hypothesis that the effect of prior internal political efficacy on post internal political efficacy is equal to zero must be rejected. However none of the other variables in this model are statistically significant, so we must fail to reject the null hypotheses for each of them.

Authors: Bryant, Jane.
first   previous   Page 21 of 42   next   last



background image
21
Cognitive Pre Score
1.299
.740
.060
1.755 .
080
Time (took class in Fall)
-.140
.270
-.018
-.519 .
604
Space (took class online)
-.090
.438
-007
-.206 .
837
Location (took class at JALC)
.395
.300
.047
1.315 .
189
F = 78.072, p <.01; Adjusted R
2
= .432.
Table 3 presents findings from the multiple regression analysis of the post internal
efficacy scores. The adjusted R
2
of .432 indicates that this model explains about 43% of the
variance in the post internal political efficacy. Furthermore, the probability of the F value of
78.072 for this model is less than the alpha level of .01. Therefore, the null hypothesis that the
combined effects of prior internal political efficacy, cognitive pre score, time, space, and location
is equal to zero must be rejected. A significant amount of variation in the post political
knowledge percentage is explained by this model.
Table 3 illustrates that post internal political efficacy will increase 1.299 for each unit
change in prior internal political efficacy, holding constant all other variables in this model.
Upon examining the significance associated with obtaining the t value (19.513) for this
coefficient, the null hypothesis that the effect of prior internal political efficacy on post internal
political efficacy is equal to zero must be rejected. However none of the other variables in this
model are statistically significant, so we must fail to reject the null hypotheses for each of them.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 21 of 42   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.