All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Learning Democratic Citizenship: An Experiment in Teaching Deliberation
Unformatted Document Text:  Doble, J., Peng, I., Frank, T., & Salim, D. (1999). The enduring effects of National Issues Forums (NIF) on high school students. Unpublished manuscript. Englund, T. (2002). Higher education, democracy and citizenship-the democratic potential of the university? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4-5), 281-287. Enslin., P., Pendlebury, S., & Tjiattas, M. (2001). Deliberative democracy, diversity and challenges. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 115-130. Ervin, E. (1997). Encouraging civic participation among first-year writing students. Rhetoric Review, 15(2), 382-399. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the learning in service learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Galston, W. A. (2003). Civic knowledge, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. In Constructing civic virtue (pp. 35-55). Syracuse, NY: Campbell Public Affairs Institute. Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). The aims, methods and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums. Communication Education, 48, 179-192. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. The Harwood Group. (1993). College students talk politics. Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation. Hays, C. (1998). Alienation, engagement, and the college student. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. Jacoby, B. (Ed.). (1996). Service-learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. The Kettering Foundation. (1992). Politics for the twenty-first century: What should be done on campus? Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation. Kiesa, A., et.al. (2007). Millenials Talk Politics: A Study of College Student Political Engagement. Report by CIRCLE. Loeb, P. R. (1994). Generation at the crossroads. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. London, S. (2000). Higher education and public life: Restoring the bond. Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation.

Authors: Harriger, Katy. and McMillan, Jill.
first   previous   Page 24 of 26   next   last



background image
Doble, J., Peng, I., Frank, T., & Salim, D. (1999). The enduring effects of National Issues Forums
(NIF) on high school students. Unpublished manuscript.
Englund, T. (2002). Higher education, democracy and citizenship-the democratic potential of the
university? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4-5), 281-287.
Enslin., P., Pendlebury, S., & Tjiattas, M. (2001). Deliberative democracy, diversity and challenges.
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 115-130.
Ervin, E. (1997). Encouraging civic participation among first-year writing students. Rhetoric Review,
15(2), 382-399.
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the learning in service learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Galston, W. A. (2003). Civic knowledge, and civic engagement: A summary of recent research. In
Constructing civic virtue (pp. 35-55). Syracuse, NY: Campbell Public Affairs Institute.
Gastil, J., & Dillard, J. P. (1999). The aims, methods and effects of deliberative civic education through
the National Issues Forums. Communication Education, 48, 179-192.
Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The Harwood Group. (1993). College students talk politics. Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation.
Hays, C. (1998). Alienation, engagement, and the college student. Lanham, MD: Rowman and
Littlefield Publishers.
Jacoby, B. (Ed.). (1996). Service-learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
The Kettering Foundation. (1992). Politics for the twenty-first century: What should be done on
campus? Dayton, OH: The Kettering Foundation.
Kiesa, A., et.al. (2007). Millenials Talk Politics: A Study of College Student Political Engagement.
Report by CIRCLE.
Loeb, P. R. (1994). Generation at the crossroads. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
London, S. (2000). Higher education and public life: Restoring the bond. Dayton, OH: The Kettering
Foundation.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 24 of 26   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.