All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Reacting to the Past: Extended Simulations and the Learning Experience in Political Science
Unformatted Document Text:  Were you actively involved in the Reacting 0% 11.8% 11.8% 76.5% 17 learning process through hands-on Other 7.5% 38.2% 38.7% 15.6% 199 activities? D = .608 Chi-Square = 23.16 p < .001 Did you make a class Reacting 0% 23.5% 41.2% 35.3% 17 presentation? Other 4% 28.3% 37.9% 29.8% 197 D = .055 Chi-Square = .169 NS Fall 2007 Did you work with other students Reacting 0% 20% 33.3% 46.7% 15 on projects during class? Other 13.1% 47.6% 28.2% 10.7% 205 D = .407 Chi-Square = 9.26 p < .01 Did you work with classmates Reacting 0% 26.7% 46.7% 26.7% 15 outside of class to prepare class Other 22.3% 44.7% 26.7% 5.3% 204 assignments? D = .403 Chi-Square = 9.08 p < .01 Were you actively involved in the Reacting 0% 6.7% 26.7% 66.7% 15 learning process through hands-on Other 6.3% 39.8% 33% 18.9% 202 activities? D = .394 Chi-Square = 8.68 p < .05 Did you make a class Reacting 0% 6.7% 26.7% 66.7% 15 presentation? Other 3.4% 36.4% 36.4% 23.3% 205 D = .334 Chi-Square = 6.24 p < .05 ___________________________________________________ Very Some- Quite Very Class Little times a Bit Much N ___________________________________________________ Synthetic Learning Fall 2006 Were you asked to include diverse Reacting 0% 11.8% 29.4% 58.8% 17 perspectives (race, gender, religion) Other 5.1% 27.8% 41.4% 25.8% 198 in class? D = .331 Chi-Square = 6.86 p < .05 Did coursework emphasize Reacting 0% 0% 64.7% 35.3% 17 synthesizing and organizing ideas, Other 2.0% 31.8% 43.4% 18.2% 198 information, or experiences? D = .338 Chi-Square = 7.15 p < .05 Did coursework emphasize making Reacting 0% 0% 70.6% 29.4% 17 judgments about the value of Other 2.0% 27.8% 45.5% 24.7% 198 information, arguments, or methods? D = .298 Chi-Square = 5.56 p < .10 Did coursework emphasize applying Reacting 0% 5.9% 64.7% 29.4% 17 theories or concepts to practical Other 4.5% 30.8% 37.4% 27.3% 198 problems or new situations? D = .294 Chi-Square = 5.41 p < .10 20

Authors: Lightcap, Tracy.
first   previous   Page 20 of 21   next   last



background image
Were you actively involved in the
Reacting
0%
11.8%
11.8%
76.5% 17
learning process through hands-on
Other
7.5%
38.2%
38.7%
15.6% 199
activities?
D = .608 Chi-Square = 23.16 p < .001
Did you make a class
Reacting
0%
23.5%
41.2%
35.3% 17
presentation?
Other
4%
28.3%
37.9%
29.8% 197
D = .055 Chi-Square = .169 NS
Fall 2007
Did you work with other students
Reacting
0%
20%
33.3%
46.7% 15
on projects during class?
Other
13.1%
47.6%
28.2%
10.7% 205
D = .407 Chi-Square = 9.26 p < .01
Did you work with classmates
Reacting
0%
26.7%
46.7%
26.7% 15
outside of class to prepare class
Other
22.3%
44.7%
26.7%
5.3% 204
assignments?
D = .403 Chi-Square = 9.08 p < .01
Were you actively involved in the
Reacting
0%
6.7%
26.7%
66.7% 15
learning process through hands-on
Other
6.3%
39.8%
33%
18.9% 202
activities?
D = .394 Chi-Square = 8.68 p < .05
Did you make a class
Reacting
0%
6.7%
26.7%
66.7% 15
presentation?
Other
3.4%
36.4%
36.4%
23.3% 205
D = .334 Chi-Square = 6.24 p < .05
___________________________________________________
Very
Some-
Quite
Very
Class
Little
times
a Bit
Much N
___________________________________________________
Synthetic Learning
Fall 2006
Were you asked to include diverse
Reacting
0%
11.8%
29.4%
58.8% 17
perspectives (race, gender, religion)
Other
5.1%
27.8%
41.4%
25.8% 198
in class?
D = .331 Chi-Square = 6.86 p < .05
Did coursework emphasize
Reacting
0%
0%
64.7%
35.3% 17
synthesizing and organizing ideas,
Other
2.0%
31.8%
43.4%
18.2% 198
information, or experiences?
D = .338 Chi-Square = 7.15 p < .05
Did coursework emphasize making
Reacting
0%
0%
70.6%
29.4% 17
judgments about the value of
Other
2.0%
27.8%
45.5%
24.7% 198
information, arguments, or methods?
D = .298 Chi-Square = 5.56 p < .10
Did coursework emphasize applying
Reacting
0%
5.9%
64.7%
29.4% 17
theories or concepts to practical
Other
4.5%
30.8%
37.4%
27.3% 198
problems or new situations?
D = .294 Chi-Square = 5.41 p < .10
20


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 20 of 21   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.