All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Reacting to the Past: Extended Simulations and the Learning Experience in Political Science
Unformatted Document Text:  Were you actively involved in the Reacting 0% 11.8% 11.8% 76.5% 17 learning process through hands-on Other 7.5% 38.2% 38.7% 15.6% 199 activities? D = .608 Chi-Square = 23.16 p < .001 Did you make a class Reacting 0% 23.5% 41.2% 35.3% 17 presentation? Other 4% 28.3% 37.9% 29.8% 197 D = .055 Chi-Square = .169 NS Fall 2007 Did you work with other students Reacting 0% 20% 33.3% 46.7% 15 on projects during class? Other 13.1% 47.6% 28.2% 10.7% 205 D = .407 Chi-Square = 9.26 p < .01 Did you work with classmates Reacting 0% 26.7% 46.7% 26.7% 15 outside of class to prepare class Other 22.3% 44.7% 26.7% 5.3% 204 assignments? D = .403 Chi-Square = 9.08 p < .01 Were you actively involved in the Reacting 0% 6.7% 26.7% 66.7% 15 learning process through hands-on Other 6.3% 39.8% 33% 18.9% 202 activities? D = .394 Chi-Square = 8.68 p < .05 Did you make a class Reacting 0% 6.7% 26.7% 66.7% 15 presentation? Other 3.4% 36.4% 36.4% 23.3% 205 D = .334 Chi-Square = 6.24 p < .05 ___________________________________________________ Very Some- Quite Very Class Little times a Bit Much N ___________________________________________________ Synthetic Learning Fall 2006 Were you asked to include diverse Reacting 0% 11.8% 29.4% 58.8% 17 perspectives (race, gender, religion) Other 5.1% 27.8% 41.4% 25.8% 198 in class? D = .331 Chi-Square = 6.86 p < .05 Did coursework emphasize Reacting 0% 0% 64.7% 35.3% 17 synthesizing and organizing ideas, Other 2.0% 31.8% 43.4% 18.2% 198 information, or experiences? D = .338 Chi-Square = 7.15 p < .05 Did coursework emphasize making Reacting 0% 0% 70.6% 29.4% 17 judgments about the value of Other 2.0% 27.8% 45.5% 24.7% 198 information, arguments, or methods? D = .298 Chi-Square = 5.56 p < .10 Did coursework emphasize applying Reacting 0% 5.9% 64.7% 29.4% 17 theories or concepts to practical Other 4.5% 30.8% 37.4% 27.3% 198 problems or new situations? D = .294 Chi-Square = 5.41 p < .10 20

Authors: Lightcap, Tracy.
first   previous   Page 20 of 21   next   last



background image
Were you actively involved in the
Reacting
0%
11.8%
11.8%
76.5% 17
learning process through hands-on
Other
7.5%
38.2%
38.7%
15.6% 199
activities?
D = .608 Chi-Square = 23.16 p < .001
Did you make a class
Reacting
0%
23.5%
41.2%
35.3% 17
presentation?
Other
4%
28.3%
37.9%
29.8% 197
D = .055 Chi-Square = .169 NS
Fall 2007
Did you work with other students
Reacting
0%
20%
33.3%
46.7% 15
on projects during class?
Other
13.1%
47.6%
28.2%
10.7% 205
D = .407 Chi-Square = 9.26 p < .01
Did you work with classmates
Reacting
0%
26.7%
46.7%
26.7% 15
outside of class to prepare class
Other
22.3%
44.7%
26.7%
5.3% 204
assignments?
D = .403 Chi-Square = 9.08 p < .01
Were you actively involved in the
Reacting
0%
6.7%
26.7%
66.7% 15
learning process through hands-on
Other
6.3%
39.8%
33%
18.9% 202
activities?
D = .394 Chi-Square = 8.68 p < .05
Did you make a class
Reacting
0%
6.7%
26.7%
66.7% 15
presentation?
Other
3.4%
36.4%
36.4%
23.3% 205
D = .334 Chi-Square = 6.24 p < .05
___________________________________________________
Very
Some-
Quite
Very
Class
Little
times
a Bit
Much N
___________________________________________________
Synthetic Learning
Fall 2006
Were you asked to include diverse
Reacting
0%
11.8%
29.4%
58.8% 17
perspectives (race, gender, religion)
Other
5.1%
27.8%
41.4%
25.8% 198
in class?
D = .331 Chi-Square = 6.86 p < .05
Did coursework emphasize
Reacting
0%
0%
64.7%
35.3% 17
synthesizing and organizing ideas,
Other
2.0%
31.8%
43.4%
18.2% 198
information, or experiences?
D = .338 Chi-Square = 7.15 p < .05
Did coursework emphasize making
Reacting
0%
0%
70.6%
29.4% 17
judgments about the value of
Other
2.0%
27.8%
45.5%
24.7% 198
information, arguments, or methods?
D = .298 Chi-Square = 5.56 p < .10
Did coursework emphasize applying
Reacting
0%
5.9%
64.7%
29.4% 17
theories or concepts to practical
Other
4.5%
30.8%
37.4%
27.3% 198
problems or new situations?
D = .294 Chi-Square = 5.41 p < .10
20


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 20 of 21   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.