All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Gender Quotas and Political Ambition: Evidence From Germany
Unformatted Document Text:  34 Table 4: Political Ambition in Practice Average score on a scale of 0 never attempted to run for office, 1 attempted to run for office at the local or global level, or 2 attempted to run for office at the local and global level Male Respondents Female Respondents Overall 0.97 0.98 Greens 0.98 0.96 SPD** 0.74 0.94 CDU* 1.09 0.88 CSU** 0.66 1.10 FDP 1.16 1.15 **Difference of means test, significance level p < .025 *Difference of means test, significance level p < .1 Table 5: Political Ambition in Theory % of respondents willing to accept their party’s nomination to run for an elective office (Range 0-2; 1 point given for willingness to accept nomination at local or global level) Male Respondents Female Respondents Overall ** 1.1 1.0 Greens 1.1 0.9 SPD 1.0 0.9 CDU** 1.2 0.9 CSU 0.6 0.8 FDP 1.3 1.3 **Difference of means test, significance level p < .025

Authors: Davidson-Schmich, Louise.
first   previous   Page 34 of 35   next   last



background image
34
Table 4: Political Ambition in Practice
Average score on a scale of 0 never attempted to run for office, 1 attempted to run for office at the local or global level, or 2
attempted to run for office at the local and global level
Male Respondents
Female Respondents
Overall 0.97
0.98
Greens 0.98
0.96
SPD** 0.74
0.94
CDU* 1.09 0.88
CSU** 0.66
1.10
FDP 1.16 1.15
**Difference of means test, significance level p < .025
*Difference of means test, significance level p < .1
Table 5: Political Ambition in Theory
% of respondents willing to accept their party’s nomination to run for an elective office
(Range 0-2; 1 point given for willingness to accept nomination at local or global level)
Male Respondents
Female Respondents
Overall **
1.1
1.0
Greens 1.1
0.9
SPD 1.0 0.9
CDU** 1.2
0.9
CSU 0.6 0.8
FDP 1.3 1.3
**Difference of means test, significance level p < .025


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 34 of 35   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.