All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Disclosure of Financial Instruments According to the International Accounting Standards: Empirical Evidences of Brazilian Companies
Unformatted Document Text:  For the United Stated, the FASB signed a convergence agreement with IASB in 2002, prediciting that, until 2008, the existing differences should be adjusted between the North American accounting standards and those issued internationally (LEMES, CARVALHO and OLIVEIRA-LOPES, 2007). Regarding to Brazil, in this same line, the CVM (2008a, p. 1) determined that the Brazilian publicly traded companies shall, from the fiscal year of 2010, “present their consolidated financial statements adopting the international accounting standard, in accordance with the pronouncing issued by IASB”. In accordance with the IASB standards, the disclosure of financial instruments is regulated by IFRS 7. Its objective is to require that the entities provide disclosure in their financial reports that allows to their users to evaluate: the meaning of the financial instruments for the financial position and performance of the company; and ii) the nature and the extension of the risks resulted from the financial instruments of which the entity is exposed to during the period and date of the report, and how the entity administrates such risks. These requirements include a minimum and specific disclosure about the credit risk, liquidity risk and market risks (IASB, 2008b). The standards involve a qualitative and quantitative disclosure that, together, may provide a general view about the use of the financial instruments by the entity and the exposure to the consequent risk of this use. 4 Methodological aspects 4.1 Companies selection and reports collection For the Brazilian capital market, the analyzed reports were the DFP (Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas - Standardized Financial Statements); for the North American capital market, the analyzed reports were the Form_20F, which are the forms with the accounting reports that the companies shall present, in accordance with the standards disposed by the FASB. These forms have the deadline until June 30 of the subsequent fiscal year to be sent to SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission). Due to the fact of this research have started in January, 2008, the recently available Forms_20F for download were from the fiscal year of 2006. Regarding to the number of accounting years to be analyzed, the last five were selected (from 2002 to 2006). Before collecting the accounting reports, the selection of which companies would be part of the data base for the reports consultancy was necessary. So, a research in the CVM (2008c) register was started, in which was identified the existence of 102 registrations of Brazilian companies that issued any kind of title in the American market. A filter in these 102 registrations included the three following steps: The exclusion of the financial companies; ii) the exclusion of the companies which do not negotiate ADR (American Depositary Receipts) in the levels II or III (to be obliged to elaborate the Form_20F, the companies shall issue ADR in the levels II or III); and iii) the exclusion of the companies that are not 6

Authors: Malaquias, Rodrigo. and Lemes, Sirlei.
first   previous   Page 6 of 20   next   last



background image
For the United Stated, the FASB signed a convergence agreement with IASB in 2002, prediciting that, until 2008, 
the   existing   differences   should   be   adjusted   between   the   North   American   accounting   standards   and   those   issued 
internationally (LEMES, CARVALHO and OLIVEIRA-LOPES, 2007). Regarding to Brazil, in this same line, the CVM 
(2008a, p. 1) determined that the  Brazilian publicly traded companies  shall, from the fiscal year of 2010, “present their 
consolidated financial statements adopting the international accounting standard, in accordance with the pronouncing issued 
by IASB”.
In accordance with the IASB standards, the disclosure of financial instruments is regulated by IFRS 7. Its objective 
is to require that the entities provide disclosure in their financial reports that allows to their users to evaluate: the meaning of 
the financial instruments for the financial position and performance of the company; and ii) the nature and the extension of 
the risks resulted from the financial instruments of which the entity is exposed to during the period and date of the report, 
and how the entity administrates such risks. These requirements include a minimum and specific disclosure about the credit 
risk, liquidity risk and market risks (IASB, 2008b). The standards involve a qualitative and quantitative disclosure that, 
together, may provide a general view about the use of the financial instruments by the entity and the exposure to the 
consequent risk of this use.  
4
Methodological aspects
4.1
Companies selection and reports collection
For the Brazilian capital market, the analyzed reports were the DFP (Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas - 
Standardized Financial Statements); for the North American capital market, the analyzed reports were the Form_20F, which 
are the forms with the accounting reports that the companies shall present, in accordance with the standards disposed by the 
FASB. These forms  have the deadline until June 30 of the subsequent fiscal year to be sent to SEC (Securities  and 
Exchange Commission). Due to the fact of this research have started in January, 2008, the recently available Forms_20F for 
download were from the fiscal year of 2006. Regarding to the number of accounting years to be analyzed, the last five were 
selected (from 2002 to 2006).
Before collecting the accounting reports, the selection of which companies would be part of the data base for the 
reports consultancy was necessary. So, a research in the CVM (2008c) register was started, in which was identified the 
existence of 102 registrations of Brazilian companies that issued any kind of title in the American market. A filter in these 
102 registrations included the three following steps: The exclusion of the financial companies; ii) the exclusion of the 
companies which do not negotiate ADR (American Depositary Receipts) in the levels II or III (to be obliged to elaborate the 
Form_20F, the companies shall issue ADR in the levels II or III); and iii) the exclusion of the companies that are not 
6


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 6 of 20   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.