All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A multivariate investigation of perceptions of women as managers in Chile, China, and the United States
Unformatted Document Text:  nation in a given year divided by the average (or mid-year) population for the same year, and it does account for differences in the cost of living across countries. We also used a second indicator, the Human Development Index. The HDI is a metric developed by the United Nations that measures well-being by comparing countries’ levels of poverty, literacy, education, life expectancy, childbirth, and other factors (United Nations Human Development Report, 2005). Table 2 shows the GDP + PPP, plus the HDI for the three countries. ______________________ Insert Table 2 about here ______________________ Results Our research questions focused on differences between genders and differences among countries with perceptions of women as managers. With two dimensions, Ability and Acceptance, identified we began our analysis, using a holistic multivariate approach (Barker & Barker, 1984; Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007). First, we performed a MANOVA to determine if there were differences between gender and country groups on Ability and Acceptance as a set. This was followed by an assessment of the underlying structure (review group centroids) for group differences. We also reviewed the canonical discriminate correlation between the two variables for contributions of Ability and Acceptance to the set. Second, given a significant multivariate effect, we performed an ANOVA to identify mean group differences at the univariate level. This analysis provided us information on the direction of group differences on the individual variables. There were significant differences for both the gender and country effects, at p< 0.01. Regarding gender, women were significantly different from men on the combined Ability and Acceptance set using MANOVA (F = 71.78; df = 2 and 628; p < 0.01). Women had more positive perceptions, as evidenced by the higher centroids for Chinese, Chilean, and U.S. women (see Table 3). Regarding country effects on Ability and Acceptance, US females had the highest means (53.67 and 34.07) while Chinese males had the lowest means (45.43 and 28.26), as seen in Table 3. The correlation between Ability & Acceptance was 0.37 (p<0.01). In sum, US men and women had more positive perceptions than both Chilean and Chinese men and women, while Chinese men and women held the least positive perceptions. ______________________ Insert Table 3 about here ______________________ Finally, we tested for differences between pairs of groups by making post–hoc comparisons using Scheffé tests. We found differences at the p<.05 level among most pairs (of males and females) across all countries, with at least one notable 10

Authors: Sanchez, Carol., Scherer, Robert., Javalgi, Raj., Pradenas Rojas, Lorena. and Parada Daza, Victor.
first   previous   Page 10 of 20   next   last



background image
nation in a given year divided by the average (or mid-year) population for the same year, and it does account for differences 
in the cost of living across countries.   We also used a second indicator, the Human Development Index.  The HDI is a metric 
developed by the United Nations that measures well-being by comparing countries’ levels of poverty, literacy, education, life 
expectancy, childbirth, and other factors (United Nations Human Development Report, 2005).   Table 2 shows the GDP + 
PPP, plus the HDI for the three countries. 
______________________
Insert Table 2 about here
______________________
Results
Our research questions focused on differences between genders and differences among countries with perceptions of 
women as managers.   With two dimensions, Ability and Acceptance, identified we began our analysis, using a holistic 
multivariate approach (Barker & Barker, 1984; Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007).  First, we performed a MANOVA to determine 
if there were differences between gender and country groups on Ability and Acceptance as a set.  This was followed by an 
assessment of the underlying structure (review group centroids) for group differences.   We also reviewed the canonical 
discriminate correlation between the two variables for contributions of Ability and Acceptance to the set.  Second, given a 
significant multivariate effect, we performed an ANOVA to identify mean group differences at the univariate level.  This 
analysis provided us information on the direction of group differences on the individual variables.
There were significant differences for both the gender and country effects, at p< 0.01.  Regarding gender, women 
were significantly different from men on the combined Ability and Acceptance set using MANOVA (F = 71.78; df = 2 and 
628; p < 0.01).  Women had more positive perceptions, as evidenced by the higher centroids for Chinese, Chilean, and U.S. 
women (see Table 3).  Regarding country effects on Ability and Acceptance, US females had the highest means (53.67 and 
34.07) while Chinese males had the lowest means (45.43 and 28.26), as seen in Table 3.  The correlation between Ability & 
Acceptance was 0.37 (p<0.01).  In sum, US men and women had more positive perceptions than both Chilean and Chinese 
men and women, while Chinese men and women held the least positive perceptions. 
______________________
Insert Table 3 about here
______________________
Finally, we tested for differences between pairs of groups by making post–hoc comparisons using Scheffé tests.  We 
found differences at the p<.05 level among most pairs (of males and females) across all countries, with at least one notable 
10


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 10 of 20   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.