All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Comparison between Performances of Microfinancial Institutions in Brazil and Latin America
Unformatted Document Text:  Microcredit in Brazil “It is estimated that there are approximately 16 million small productive units in Brazil, which are eventual microcredit clients, out of which 13 million are own-account workers which implies that there are approximately 7 million potential clients exercising real demand. In figures, that represents approximately R$11 billion; even though it is a high value, it counts for less that 1% of GNP of Brazil.” (Santos & Silva, 2006) Even though microcredit has been present in Brazil since 1973, it was in 1999 that significant changes were made in the sector as per Law No. 9,790/99, which stated that microcredit NGOs could operate as OSCIPs by using public funds. Previously to that Law’s enactment, two models regarding service providing to the microcredit clients had been considered. First, the developmentism advocated that MIFs should focus on fighting poverty by granting credit and also by providing technical- management ability, assistance to commerce, community life experience, etc. Second, the minimalism stated that MIF should perform its only role as grantor only if it had self-sustainability, and therefore, could only offer financial services. In Brazil the latter has been selected, because it required fewer subsidies and allowed MIFs to reach sustainability more rapidly (Santos & Silva, 2006). Ever since minimalism has been opted for, SCMs emerged in 1999 in order to attract private capital to the sector and also to withstand the considerable market pressure for the establishment of a government agency to inspect those institutions since microcredit emerged in Brazil, as well as in other countries, alongside of the financial system and not subjected to banking supervision. In December 2004, there were 40 SCMs operating in Brazil. The loan portfolio increased uninterruptedly; however, with a deceleration in the period of 2003-2004 in light of changes to microcredit incentive policies, especially after interruption of Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES)´s fund releases 2 , usually directed to MIFs. The microcredit average loan portfolio was twice as high between 2002 and 2004, increasing from R$390,000 to R$768,000 at the end of the period. In December 2004, portfolio of operating SCMs held a small number of institutions. The three largest institutions accounted for 50% of the total sector loans and the 11 largest institutions accounted for 80%. Crediamigo is a public initiative and is the largest microcredit operation in Brazil. In December 2004, it held a portfolio of R$106 million, and SCMs of R$31 million. Total estimate of microcredit portfolio would be R$210 million. 2 BNDES is a government onlending or development bank 7

Authors: Gonzalez, Rodrigo., Savoia, José., Monteiro, Marcelo. and Fonseca, Ligia.
first   previous   Page 7 of 17   next   last



background image
Microcredit in Brazil
“It is estimated that there are approximately 16 million small productive units in Brazil, which are eventual microcredit clients, 
out of which 13 million are own-account workers which implies that there are approximately 7 million potential clients exercising 
real demand.  In figures, that represents approximately R$11 billion; even though it is a high value, it counts for less that 1% of 
GNP of Brazil.” (Santos & Silva, 2006)
Even though microcredit has been present in Brazil since 1973, it was in 1999 that significant changes were made in the sector as 
per Law No. 9,790/99, which stated that microcredit NGOs could operate as OSCIPs by using public funds.  Previously to that 
Law’s   enactment,   two   models   regarding   service   providing   to   the   microcredit   clients   had   been   considered.     First,   the 
developmentism advocated that  MIFs should focus  on fighting poverty by granting credit  and also by providing technical-
management ability, assistance to commerce, community life experience, etc.  Second, the minimalism stated that MIF should 
perform its only role as grantor only if it had self-sustainability, and therefore, could only offer financial services.  In Brazil the 
latter has been selected, because it required fewer subsidies and allowed MIFs to reach sustainability more rapidly (Santos & 
Silva, 2006).   
Ever since minimalism has been opted for, SCMs emerged in 1999 in order to attract private capital to the sector and also to 
withstand the considerable market pressure for the establishment of a government agency to inspect those institutions since 
microcredit emerged in Brazil, as well as in other countries, alongside of the financial system and not subjected to banking 
supervision.   
In December 2004, there were 40 SCMs operating in Brazil.   The loan portfolio increased uninterruptedly; however, with a 
deceleration in the period of 2003-2004 in light of changes to microcredit incentive policies, especially after interruption of 
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES)´s fund releases
, usually directed to MIFs.  
The microcredit average loan portfolio was twice as high between 2002 and 2004, increasing from R$390,000 to R$768,000 at 
the end of the period.  In December 2004, portfolio of operating SCMs held a small number of institutions.  The three largest 
institutions accounted for 50% of the total sector loans and the 11 largest institutions accounted for 80%.  
Crediamigo is a public initiative and is the largest microcredit operation in Brazil. In December 2004, it held a portfolio of R$106 
million, and SCMs of R$31 million.  Total estimate of microcredit portfolio would be R$210 million.
2
 BNDES is a government onlending or development bank
7


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 7 of 17   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.