All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Knowledge sharing across cultures
Unformatted Document Text:  1 * Knowledge sharing across cultures Abstract The use of Knowledge Management Systems to share knowledge starts with people who are willing to share their knowledge. This study investigates the effect of the type of information to be disclosed, the possibility of sharing the information anonymously, and the obtainment of a reward in cash on willingness to share information. Data for the experiment were collected in Chile and Mexico. Findings suggest that people are likely to share positive information (information that discloses a success) rather than negative information (information that discloses a mistake). The possibility of posting the information anonymously incentivizes people to disclose negative information. Yet, about half of the participants are not willing to believe that anonymity can be ensured, limiting the effectiveness of anonymity as an incentive to share knowledge. The obtainment of a cash reward had no effect on the willingness to share information. Keywords: knowledge management systems, information sharing, cross-cultural research Introduction Multinational companies including most global audit firms have implemented Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) with the intention of sharing knowledge and improving practice across their business units worldwide. KMS are particularly important to the assurance and tax community because sharing knowledge can help accounting firms to increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of the assurance process by “leveraging the skills, knowledge, and best practices of their professional staff” (Vera-Muñoz, Ho, & Chow, 2006, p. 133). KMS usage is also spreading to regional accounting firms (Leech & Sutton, 2002). The 2007 CCH Intelligent Business Survey reports that about one third of the firms surveyed are using formal KMS (Anoymous, 2008). Due to the importance of KMS to the accounting profession, it has been pointed out the need to conduct research in this area (Leech & Sutton, 2002). Successful KMS implementations can founder on multiple organizational and technical issues. Ironically, the willingness of the original knowledge creator to share knowledge with the KMS is the critical success factor (Alavi & Leidner, 1999, 2001). In essence KMS exist because someone is willing to share their knowledge. If employees do not share their knowledge, the KMS will be empty and ergo ineffective. As Kankanhalli, Tan, & Wei, 2005, p. 113 note, “a large number of failures in KMS initiatives are due to user resistance to share knowledge through systems”. For this reason, practitioners consider motivating employees to share their knowledge one of the most important issues in using KMS (King, Marks, & McCoy, 2002). It is important, therefore, to understand the factors affecting the willingness to share information. Past research on information sharing in the context of KMS has focused on the individual and organizational factors influencing knowledge sharing behaviors in a single country with a less than clear resolution (see Yang & Chen, 2007 for a review). Implementing multinational KMS are more complex than just national

Authors: Salter, Stephen. and Huerta, Esperanza.
first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last



background image
 
* Knowledge sharing across cultures  
Abstract 
The use of Knowledge Management Systems to share knowledge starts with people who are willing to 
share their knowledge. This study investigates the effect of the type of information to be disclosed, the 
possibility of sharing the information anonymously, and the obtainment of a reward in cash on 
willingness to share information. Data for the experiment were collected in Chile and Mexico. Findings 
suggest that people are likely to share positive information (information that discloses a success) rather 
than negative information (information that discloses a mistake). The possibility of posting the 
information anonymously incentivizes people to disclose negative information. Yet, about half of the 
participants are not willing to believe that anonymity can be ensured, limiting the effectiveness of 
anonymity as an incentive to share knowledge. The obtainment of a cash reward had no effect on the 
willingness to share information. 
Keywords: knowledge management systems, information sharing, cross-cultural research 
Introduction 
Multinational companies including most global audit firms have implemented Knowledge Management 
Systems (KMS) with the intention of sharing knowledge and improving practice across their business 
units worldwide. KMS are particularly important to the assurance and tax community because sharing 
knowledge can help accounting firms to increase the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of the 
assurance process by “leveraging the skills, knowledge, and best practices of their professional staff” 
(Vera-Muñoz, Ho, & Chow, 2006, p. 133). KMS usage is also spreading to regional accounting firms 
(Leech & Sutton, 2002). The 2007 CCH Intelligent Business Survey reports that about one third of the 
firms surveyed are using formal KMS (Anoymous, 2008). Due to the importance of KMS to the 
accounting profession, it has been pointed out the need to conduct research in this area (Leech & 
Sutton, 2002). 
 
Successful KMS implementations can founder on multiple organizational and technical issues. Ironically, 
the willingness of the original knowledge creator to share knowledge with the KMS is the critical success 
factor (Alavi & Leidner, 1999, 2001). In essence KMS exist because someone is willing to share their 
knowledge. If employees do not share their knowledge, the KMS will be empty and ergo ineffective.  As 
Kankanhalli, Tan, & Wei, 2005, p. 113 note, “a large number of failures in KMS initiatives are due to user 
resistance to share knowledge through systems”. For this reason, practitioners consider motivating 
employees to share their knowledge one of the most important issues in using KMS (King, Marks, & 
McCoy, 2002).  
It is important, therefore, to understand the factors affecting the willingness to share information. Past 
research on information sharing in the context of KMS has focused on the individual and organizational 
factors influencing knowledge sharing behaviors in a single country with a less than clear resolution (see 
Yang & Chen, 2007 for a review). Implementing multinational KMS are more complex than just national 


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 20   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.