All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Measuring Victimhood: Developing a Victim Self-Ascription Scale
Unformatted Document Text:  DRAFT – For permission to cite contact Andy Davies on ## email not listed ## Descriptive Statistics Scale scores for each of the measures of injustice, harm and external attribution were summed for each subject, transformed into z-scores and centered to minimize intercollinearity problems. Interaction terms between each were then computed. Secondary rights were measured as a simple count of the number of rights subjects considered they acquired as a result of their victimization from a possible five, with the average subject self-ascribing 3.86. Victim self-ascription was measured with a single item in the survey which asked whether subjects agreed with the statement ‘I consider myself a victim’. Answers were on a six-point scale and the average score was 3.48 –a position at the mid-point of the scale, between ‘slightly agree’ and ‘slightly disagree’ (see Table 2). - Insert Table 2 about here - Reported victimization experiences A total of 170 subjects filled out the victim perception measures. Of these, only 166 indicated the type of victimization that their responses referred to. However, a small number of subjects indicated that their victimization fell into more than one of the categories indicated on the screener. Therefore, a total of 174 responses were received describing the types of victimization experienced. The distribution of these is reported in Table 3. - Insert Table 3 about here - Controlling for methodological artifacts Before embarking on the regression analyses, the data were examined for the presence of three possible Page 15

Authors: Davies, Andrew.
first   previous   Page 15 of 36   next   last

background image
DRAFT – For permission to cite contact Andy Davies on ## email not listed ##
Descriptive Statistics
Scale scores for each of the measures of injustice, harm and external attribution were summed for each 
subject, transformed into z-scores and centered to minimize intercollinearity problems.  Interaction 
terms between each were then computed.  Secondary rights were measured as a simple count of the 
number of rights subjects considered they acquired as a result of their victimization from a possible 
five, with the average subject self-ascribing 3.86.  Victim self-ascription was measured with a single 
item in the survey which asked whether subjects agreed with the statement ‘I consider myself a victim’. 
Answers were on a six-point scale and the average score was 3.48 –a position at the mid-point of the 
scale, between ‘slightly agree’ and ‘slightly disagree’ (see Table 2).
- Insert Table 2 about here -
Reported victimization experiences
A total of 170 subjects filled out the victim perception measures.  Of these, only 166 indicated the type 
of victimization that their responses referred to.  However, a small number of subjects indicated that 
their victimization fell into more than one of the categories indicated on the screener.  Therefore, a total 
of 174 responses were received describing the types of victimization experienced.  The distribution of 
these is reported in Table 3.
- Insert Table 3 about here -
Controlling for methodological artifacts
Before embarking on the regression analyses, the data were examined for the presence of three possible 
Page 15

All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 15 of 36   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.