All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Broken Gate? A Study of the PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Past, Present, and Future
Unformatted Document Text:  Broken Gate? curtailed (Robertson, 2007). In the year 2005, only 2,653 inmate civil rights cases were appealed to our nation’s 13 circuit courts of appeal, and only 1% of those cases were granted certiorari to be heard by the United States Supreme Court (Robertson, 2007, p. 184). The impact of the PLRA has also been felt by the act’s primary intended beneficiaries – the federal district courts and state attorney general offices whose workloads were hoped to dramatically decrease because of the legislation (Smith & Nelson, 2002). Responding to a survey conducted in late 1999, 72.4% of state assistant attorneys general and 61.4% of federal district judges answered that they believed the PLRA had reduced the number of section 1983 inmate lawsuits (Smith & Nelson, 2002, pp. 296-299). Also revealing, 89.7% of those assistant attorneys general polled and 75% of those federal judges polled responded that they believed the PLRA to have a deterrent affect on would-be prisoner-litigants (Smith & Nelson, 2002, p. 301). This deterrent effect is likely impacted the most by the seemingly innocuous PLRA exhaustion requirement - which prisoner’s rights advocates have deemed “the most damaging component” of the Act (Schlanger, 2002, p. 1650). The Exhaustion Requirement The proverbial “teeth” of the PLRA, at least insofar as volume reduction is concerned, is what is known as the exhaustion requirement (Belbot, 2004). Specifically, the PLRA prohibits inmates from filing lawsuits in federal or state courts without having first exhausted their administrative remedies vis-à-vis the applicable grievance system at 11

Authors: Passarelli, Mariah.
first   previous   Page 11 of 31   next   last

background image
Broken Gate?
curtailed (Robertson, 2007).  In the year 2005, only 2,653 inmate civil rights cases were 
appealed to our nation’s 13 circuit courts of appeal, and only 1% of those cases were 
granted certiorari to be heard by the United States Supreme Court (Robertson, 2007, p. 
The impact of the PLRA has also been felt by the act’s primary intended 
beneficiaries – the federal district courts and state attorney general offices whose 
workloads were hoped to dramatically decrease because of the legislation (Smith & 
Nelson, 2002).  Responding to a survey conducted in late 1999, 72.4% of state assistant 
attorneys general and 61.4% of federal district judges answered that they believed the 
PLRA had reduced the number of section 1983 inmate lawsuits (Smith & Nelson, 2002, 
pp. 296-299).  Also revealing, 89.7% of those assistant attorneys general polled and 75% 
of those federal judges polled responded that they believed the PLRA to have a deterrent 
affect on would-be prisoner-litigants (Smith & Nelson, 2002, p. 301).  This deterrent 
effect is likely impacted the most by the seemingly innocuous PLRA exhaustion 
requirement - which prisoner’s rights advocates have deemed “the most damaging 
component” of the Act (Schlanger, 2002, p. 1650).
The Exhaustion Requirement
The proverbial “teeth” of the PLRA, at least insofar as volume reduction is 
concerned, is what is known as the exhaustion requirement (Belbot, 2004).  Specifically, 
the PLRA prohibits inmates from filing lawsuits in federal or state courts without having 
first exhausted their administrative remedies vis-à-vis the applicable grievance system at 

Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 11 of 31   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.