All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Broken Gate? A Study of the PLRA Exhaustion Requirement Past, Present, and Future
Unformatted Document Text:  Broken Gate? Prisoner Litigation, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §6601, et seq. (1998). Proceedings in forma Pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, et seq. (1996). Rapp, Geoffrey Christopher (2001). Case note: Low Riding Jackson v. District of Columbia, Yale Law Journal, 110, 1089-1096. Robertson, James E. (2001/2002). The jurisprudence of the PLRA. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92, 187-209. Robertson, James E. (2007). Recent legal developments: correctional case law 2006. Criminal Justice Review, 32. Schlanger, Margo (2002, April). Inmate litigation. Harvard Law Review, 116, 1557- 1706. Smith, Christopher (1986). Federal judges’ role in prisoner litigation: what’s necessary? what’s proper? Judicature, 70, 144-150. Smith, Christopher (1988). United States magistrates and the procession of prisoner litigation. Federal Probation, 52, 13-18. Smith, Christopher (2003). The prison reform litigation era: book-length studies and lingering research issues. The Prison Journal, 83, 337-358. Smith, Christopher & Nelson, C. (2002). Perceptions of the consequences of the Prison Litigation Reform Act: a comparison of state attorneys general and federal district judges. The Justice System Journal, 23, 295-316. Spruill v. Gillis, 372 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. 2004). U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. I (1789). U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. VIII (1789). U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. XI (1798). 30

Authors: Passarelli, Mariah.
first   previous   Page 30 of 31   next   last

background image
Broken Gate?
Prisoner Litigation, 42 Pa.C.S.A. §6601, et seq. (1998).
Proceedings in forma Pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, et seq. (1996).
Rapp, Geoffrey Christopher (2001).  Case note: Low Riding Jackson v. District of 
Columbia, Yale Law Journal, 110, 1089-1096.
Robertson, James E. (2001/2002).  The jurisprudence of the PLRA.  Journal 
of Criminal Law and Criminology, 92, 187-209.
Robertson, James E. (2007).  Recent legal developments: correctional case law 
2006.  Criminal Justice Review, 32.
Schlanger, Margo (2002, April).  Inmate litigation.  Harvard Law Review, 116, 1557-
Smith, Christopher (1986).  Federal judges’ role in prisoner litigation: 
what’s necessary? what’s proper?  Judicature, 70, 144-150.
Smith, Christopher (1988).  United States magistrates and the procession of 
prisoner litigation.  Federal Probation, 52, 13-18.
Smith, Christopher (2003).  The prison reform litigation era: book-length 
studies and lingering research issues.  The Prison Journal, 83, 337-358.
Smith, Christopher & Nelson, C. (2002).  Perceptions of the consequences of the Prison 
Litigation Reform Act: a comparison of state attorneys general and federal district 
judges.  The Justice System Journal, 23, 295-316.
Spruill v. Gillis, 372 F.3d 218 (3d Cir. 2004).
U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. I (1789).
U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. VIII (1789).
U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. XI (1798).

Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 30 of 31   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.