All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Imprisoned Imperceptions: Inaccuracy in Incarceration Demographic Stereotypes
Unformatted Document Text:  Incarceration Beliefs extent to which stereotypes are shared. Consensual stereotypes have long been characterized as false myths perpetrated by exploitative hierarchies serving to justify the status quo (e.g., Allport, 1954; Jost & Banaji, 1994; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Thus, it seems particularly important to assess the accuracy of these group-level beliefs. Our research also analyzes accuracy (both discrepancies and correlations) at the individual level. Individual-level accuracy assesses the accuracy of each individual’s judgments, separately. For example, Fred’s beliefs may be different from Latisha’s, whose beliefs may differ from those of Bernardo. In sum, we offer four types of analyses: absolute and relative accuracy, each at the group and individual levels. Criteria for Accuracy Most of the criteria for assessing the accuracy of people’s beliefs regarding the incarcerated population were statistics provided by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics and published in the Midyear 2005 Bulletin and the Education and Correctional Populations (2003) report. Information on mental illness rates among the incarcerated was obtained from the Special Report: Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers (1999) report. All criteria for assessing the accuracy of people’s beliefs regarding the United States’ population were statistics provided by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2005 American Community Survey. Results Testing the Three Stereotyping Hypotheses System justification theory. System justification theory predicts that people will overestimate the proportion of disadvantaged groups in the prison population and underestimate the proportion of advantaged groups in the prison population. Thus, in the present study, perceivers should underestimate the proportion of Whites, men and high school graduates in the prison population, and overestimate the proportion of women, Blacks, Latinos, and the mentally ill in the prison population. 12

Authors: Ragusa, Laura.
first   previous   Page 12 of 38   next   last

background image
Incarceration Beliefs
extent to which stereotypes are shared. Consensual stereotypes have long been characterized as false 
myths perpetrated by exploitative hierarchies serving to justify the status quo (e.g., Allport, 1954; 
Jost & Banaji, 1994; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999). Thus, it seems particularly important to assess the 
accuracy of these group-level beliefs.
Our research also analyzes accuracy (both discrepancies and correlations) at the individual 
level. Individual-level accuracy assesses the accuracy of each individual’s judgments, separately.  For 
example, Fred’s beliefs may be different from Latisha’s, whose beliefs may differ from those of 
Bernardo.  In sum, we offer four types of analyses: absolute and relative accuracy, each at the group 
and individual levels.
Criteria for Accuracy
Most of the criteria for assessing the accuracy of people’s beliefs regarding the incarcerated 
population were statistics provided by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics 
and published in the Midyear 2005 Bulletin and the Education and Correctional Populations (2003) 
report.  Information on mental illness rates among the incarcerated was obtained from the Special 
Report: Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers (1999) report.  All criteria for 
assessing the accuracy of people’s beliefs regarding the United States’ population were statistics 
provided by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2005 American Community Survey. 
Testing the Three Stereotyping Hypotheses 
System justification theory.  System justification theory predicts that people will overestimate 
the proportion of disadvantaged groups in the prison population and underestimate the proportion of 
advantaged groups in the prison population. Thus, in the present study, perceivers should 
underestimate the proportion of Whites, men and high school graduates in the prison population, and 
overestimate the proportion of women, Blacks, Latinos, and the mentally ill in the prison population. 

Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 38   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.