Citation

A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models of Procedural Justice: Moving Towards a Coherent Framework

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to move toward refining a model of procedural justice. We tested two models. The group engagement model (Tyler & Blader, 2003) proposes that procedural justice influences outcomes through its effect on people’s sense of social identity. Organizational researchers propose that people make four distinct justice judgments, each of which is associated with separate outcomes (Bies & Moag, 1986; Colquitt, 2001). Both models were tested using an experimental design. Structural equation models supported the organizational model over the group engagement model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and application.
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Psychology - Law Society
URL:
http://www.ap-ls.org/


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398612_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Wingrove, Twila. and Wiener, Richard. "A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models of Procedural Justice: Moving Towards a Coherent Framework" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Westin Bayshore Hotel, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Mar 18, 2010 <Not Available>. 2014-11-28 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398612_index.html>

APA Citation:

Wingrove, T. and Wiener, R. L. , 2010-03-18 "A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models of Procedural Justice: Moving Towards a Coherent Framework" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Westin Bayshore Hotel, Vancouver, BC, Canada <Not Available>. 2014-11-28 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398612_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to move toward refining a model of procedural justice. We tested two models. The group engagement model (Tyler & Blader, 2003) proposes that procedural justice influences outcomes through its effect on people’s sense of social identity. Organizational researchers propose that people make four distinct justice judgments, each of which is associated with separate outcomes (Bies & Moag, 1986; Colquitt, 2001). Both models were tested using an experimental design. Structural equation models supported the organizational model over the group engagement model. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and application.


Similar Titles:
Emphasizing Procedural Justice with Victims of Domestic Violence: Towards a More Effective Model of Service

Moving towards Models of Development in Transitional Justice Processes

Do Models of Procedural Justice Apply to Children? Exploring Procedural Justice in Child Protection Proceedings


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.