Citation

Use of evidence as an investigative interviewing tool: Improving confession diagnosticity

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

A 2 evidence disclosure (late vs. early) X 2 suspect status (guilty vs. innocent) study examined the effects of these manipulated variables on overall confession rates and likelihood to produce true or false confessions. The late disclosure was associated with fewer confessions for guilty suspects when compared with those in the early disclosure, contrary to expectation. Participants in a follow-up study made guilt/innocent judgments based on the videotaped interviews. No effect was found for either suspect status or evidence disclosure, due mostly to the fact that participants did not attend to statement-evidence consistency (Hartwig et al., 2005; 2006).
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Psychology - Law Society
URL:
http://www.ap-ls.org/


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398874_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Jordan, Sarah., Hartwig, Maria., Dawson, M.. and Wallace, Brian. "Use of evidence as an investigative interviewing tool: Improving confession diagnosticity" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Westin Bayshore Hotel, Vancouver, BC, Canada, <Not Available>. 2014-11-28 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398874_index.html>

APA Citation:

Jordan, S. , Hartwig, M. , Dawson, M. and Wallace, B. "Use of evidence as an investigative interviewing tool: Improving confession diagnosticity" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society, Westin Bayshore Hotel, Vancouver, BC, Canada <Not Available>. 2014-11-28 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p398874_index.html

Publication Type: Symposium Paper
Abstract: A 2 evidence disclosure (late vs. early) X 2 suspect status (guilty vs. innocent) study examined the effects of these manipulated variables on overall confession rates and likelihood to produce true or false confessions. The late disclosure was associated with fewer confessions for guilty suspects when compared with those in the early disclosure, contrary to expectation. Participants in a follow-up study made guilt/innocent judgments based on the videotaped interviews. No effect was found for either suspect status or evidence disclosure, due mostly to the fact that participants did not attend to statement-evidence consistency (Hartwig et al., 2005; 2006).


Similar Titles:
Exploring the Use of DNA Evidence by Homicide Detectives: Investigative Super-weapon or Tool of Last Resort?

Sex Crimes Investigators’ Use of DNA Evidence: Results from Interviews with Houston Police Department Investigators

Challenges with Investigating Sexual Assaults: Evidence from Case Files and Interviews with Investigators


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.