Citation

Giddens’ “Structuration,” Luhmann’s “Self-organization,” and the Operationalization of the Dynamics of Meaning

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

The two most influential European theories, designed to capture the complexities of decision-making and social change in the modern world, Luhmann’s social systems theory and Giddens’ structuration theory of action share an emphasis on reflexivity. They also focus on meaning along a divide between inter-human communication and intentional action as two different systems of reference. These contrast with the theories that inform most North American sociologists and political scientists, who tend to regard direct input-output relations between institutions and human actors as largely unproblematic.

By recombining these two European theories we are able to provide simulations of interaction, organization, and self-organization in the communication of meaning as an additional layer of inter-human communications. This layer remains structurally rooted in the double contingency of the human encounter; the two layers are reflexive upon, and therefore reconstructive to, each other. Using the mutual information in three dimensions, the imprint of meaning processing in the modelling system on the historical development of uncertainty in the modelled system can be measured. This is shown with an empirical case of intellectual organization in a textual domain of scientific articles.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

system (125), communic (108), organ (102), structur (99), expect (91), mean (83), model (75), 1 (73), interact (67), xt (58), oper (58), social (52), inform (50), differ (46), self (46), code (45), theori (44), among (42), luhmann (42), one (41), level (40),
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: Seventeenth International Conference of the Council for European Studies
URL:
http://www.ces.columbia.edu


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p400007_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Leydesdorff, Loet. "Giddens’ “Structuration,” Luhmann’s “Self-organization,” and the Operationalization of the Dynamics of Meaning" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Seventeenth International Conference of the Council for European Studies, Grand Plaza, Montreal, Canada, <Not Available>. 2014-11-27 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p400007_index.html>

APA Citation:

Leydesdorff, L. "Giddens’ “Structuration,” Luhmann’s “Self-organization,” and the Operationalization of the Dynamics of Meaning" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Seventeenth International Conference of the Council for European Studies, Grand Plaza, Montreal, Canada Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2014-11-27 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p400007_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The two most influential European theories, designed to capture the complexities of decision-making and social change in the modern world, Luhmann’s social systems theory and Giddens’ structuration theory of action share an emphasis on reflexivity. They also focus on meaning along a divide between inter-human communication and intentional action as two different systems of reference. These contrast with the theories that inform most North American sociologists and political scientists, who tend to regard direct input-output relations between institutions and human actors as largely unproblematic.

By recombining these two European theories we are able to provide simulations of interaction, organization, and self-organization in the communication of meaning as an additional layer of inter-human communications. This layer remains structurally rooted in the double contingency of the human encounter; the two layers are reflexive upon, and therefore reconstructive to, each other. Using the mutual information in three dimensions, the imprint of meaning processing in the modelling system on the historical development of uncertainty in the modelled system can be measured. This is shown with an empirical case of intellectual organization in a textual domain of scientific articles.


Similar Titles:
A World of Beliefs: Modeling Interactions Among Agents with Different Operational Codes

Differences and similarities among Latino and White adolescents: Structural equation models of social control

Organizations as Communications. Examining the Value of Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory for Organizational Communication Research


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.