Convention All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law URL: http://www.ap-ls.org/
Citation: URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Fitzgerald, Kristine., Crewe, Katherine. and Schuller, Regina. "Race-based pretrial questioning: Can explicitly rendering racial issues salient impact jurors’ decisions in trials of Black defendants?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Hyatt Regency Miami, Miami, FL, Mar 02, 2011 <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html>

Fitzgerald, K. , Crewe, K. and Schuller, R. , 2011-03-02 "Race-based pretrial questioning: Can explicitly rendering racial issues salient impact jurors’ decisions in trials of Black defendants?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Hyatt Regency Miami, Miami, FL <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html

Publication Type: Poster Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The current study investigated the impact of race-based pretrial questioning on mock-jurors’ verdicts and case judgements in the case of a Black defendant. Mock-jurors were given publicly simulated judge’s instructions and some responded either privately or publicly to pretrial questioning before reading a drug trafficking trial summary. Results suggest that race-based pretrial questioning may result in overcorrection for racial bias, when compared to a White-no questioning condition, in verdicts and judgements. Anxiety associated with responding to race-based questioning and motivation to respond without prejudice were examined as potential mechanisms underlying the impact of the pretrial questioning procedures on jurors’ decisions.

Similar Titles:

The influence of juror gender, defendant race, and victim attractiveness on juror decision making in a sexual assault trial

The Impact of Defendant Race and Gender on Mock Jurors’ Sentencing of Psychopathic Defendants

Jury Racial Composition, Juror Race, and Defendant Race Impact Decisions in a Mock Homicide Trial