Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law URL: http://www.ap-ls.org/
Citation: URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Fitzgerald, Kristine., Crewe, Katherine. and Schuller, Regina. "Race-based pretrial questioning: Can explicitly rendering racial issues salient impact jurors’ decisions in trials of Black defendants?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Hyatt Regency Miami, Miami, FL, Mar 02, 2011 <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html>

Fitzgerald, K. , Crewe, K. and Schuller, R. , 2011-03-02 "Race-based pretrial questioning: Can explicitly rendering racial issues salient impact jurors’ decisions in trials of Black defendants?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology - Law Society / 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Hyatt Regency Miami, Miami, FL <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p483369_index.html

Publication Type: Poster Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The current study investigated the impact of race-based pretrial questioning on mock-jurors’ verdicts and case judgements in the case of a Black defendant. Mock-jurors were given publicly simulated judge’s instructions and some responded either privately or publicly to pretrial questioning before reading a drug trafficking trial summary. Results suggest that race-based pretrial questioning may result in overcorrection for racial bias, when compared to a White-no questioning condition, in verdicts and judgements. Anxiety associated with responding to race-based questioning and motivation to respond without prejudice were examined as potential mechanisms underlying the impact of the pretrial questioning procedures on jurors’ decisions.

Similar Titles:

The influence of juror gender, defendant race, and victim attractiveness on juror decision making in a sexual assault trial

The Impact of Defendant Race and Gender on Mock Jurors’ Sentencing of Psychopathic Defendants

Jury Racial Composition, Juror Race, and Defendant Race Impact Decisions in a Mock Homicide Trial