Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
Citation: URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p490060_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Schuck, Andreas., Vliegenthart, Rens. and De Vreese, Claes. "Who’s Afraid of Conflict? How Conflict Framing in Campaign News Coverage Mobilized Voters in the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, Boston, MA, May 25, 2011 <Not Available>. 2013-05-22 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p490060_index.html>

Schuck, A. , Vliegenthart, R. and De Vreese, C. H. , 2011-05-25 "Who’s Afraid of Conflict? How Conflict Framing in Campaign News Coverage Mobilized Voters in the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, Boston, MA Online <PDF>. 2013-05-22 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p490060_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this article we investigate the impact of campaign news coverage on the mobilization of voters in the 2009 European Parliamentary elections. In a unique multi-method and comparative cross-country study design we combine a media content analysis (N=52,009) with data from a two-wave panel survey conducted in 21 EU member states (N=32,411). More specifically, we focus on two distinct features of election campaign coverage, conflict and horse-race framing, and investigate to what extent this sort of news affected voters in their decision to participate in the elections. Consistent with expectations, conflict framing in campaign coverage showed to mobilize voters to turn out to vote whereas horse race framing had no effect. Furthermore, our findings suggest that conflict framing had more of an impact in countries which benefit from EU membership (i.e. countries which are net receivers from the EU) compared to countries which are net contributors.

Explaining Campaign News Coverage: How Medium, Time, and Context Explain Variation in the Media Framing of the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections

How Media Bias Affects Attitude Change: Studying Individual-Level Effects of Political Commentary on Changing Party Evaluations during the UK Election Campaign in 2005

Effects of News Media Coverage on Eurosceptic Voting: Evidence From the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections