Citation

Multiple-researcher theoretical voice analysis: Using three researchers and theoretical orientations to create a dialogue

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

Three researchers analyzed data separately using their own individual theoretical orientations or guiding perspectives. Each member was responsible for analyzing the data, which included audio recordings of interviews, interview transcripts, and notes taken by the interviewer about each participant. By using the multiple researcher approach in the analysis phase the team was able develop a more comprehensive analysis of participants’ experiences and perspectives. The researchers also used multiple researcher triangulation to corroborate and cross-check the evidence indentified by each researcher, though each theoretical orientation/paradigm provided a different finding or conclusion than the others. This approach gave the researchers the opportunity to share individual perspectives from their chosen theoretical orientation contributing different perspectives. Researchers’ perspectives, and the representative voices employed within the research findings, differed and added to a dialogue that intended to inspire new lines of thought for each co-researcher as they conducted their separate data analyses.

Author's Keywords:

Multiple researcher, qualitative, dialogue, paradigm
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: Seventh International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry
URL:
http://www.icqi.org


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p495295_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Daine, Julia. "Multiple-researcher theoretical voice analysis: Using three researchers and theoretical orientations to create a dialogue" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Seventh International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champain Illini Union, Urbana, IL, May 17, 2011 <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p495295_index.html>

APA Citation:

Daine, J. K. , 2011-05-17 "Multiple-researcher theoretical voice analysis: Using three researchers and theoretical orientations to create a dialogue" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Seventh International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champain Illini Union, Urbana, IL <Not Available>. 2014-11-26 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p495295_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Three researchers analyzed data separately using their own individual theoretical orientations or guiding perspectives. Each member was responsible for analyzing the data, which included audio recordings of interviews, interview transcripts, and notes taken by the interviewer about each participant. By using the multiple researcher approach in the analysis phase the team was able develop a more comprehensive analysis of participants’ experiences and perspectives. The researchers also used multiple researcher triangulation to corroborate and cross-check the evidence indentified by each researcher, though each theoretical orientation/paradigm provided a different finding or conclusion than the others. This approach gave the researchers the opportunity to share individual perspectives from their chosen theoretical orientation contributing different perspectives. Researchers’ perspectives, and the representative voices employed within the research findings, differed and added to a dialogue that intended to inspire new lines of thought for each co-researcher as they conducted their separate data analyses.


Similar Titles:
Creating Space for Children’s Voices in Educational Research: Experiences from Doing a Qualitative Research in Ghana

Music and Affective Response: A 20-year content and bibliometric analysis of research in three eminent journals

Gathering Youth Voices: Creating the Youth Action Research Council


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.