Citation

Imagining Politics: How Individual Differences in Imagination Shapes Public Opinion Formation

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

We argue that citizens compensate for the scarcity of information in mass politics by recruiting cognitive systems designed for the internal generation of stimuli; or, in simpler terms, by use of imagination. We test this argument in the context of two nationally representative surveys of Danish and US citizens using both survey experiments and correlational analysis. Here, we provide cross-national evidence for the assertion that personality differences in imagination (cf. the IPIP inventory) influence how and how easily citizens form political attitudes. As test case we focus on the issue of social welfare. Empirically, we demonstrate that imaginative individuals hold more extreme opinions on social welfare and that this effects occurs through two pathways: First, imagination regulates how easily individuals can spontaneously generate associations about the deservingness of social welfare recipients in situations of cue scarcity. Hence, imaginative individuals list more associations about social welfare recipients in free recall tasks and are more strongly guided by their priors when reacting to thin descriptions of specific social welfare recipients. Second, imagination regulates how vividly individuals experience the available cues and associations. Hence, the emotional reactions of imaginative individuals are more strongly guided by morally-relevant associations about social welfare recipients and imaginative individuals react more strongly to morally-relevant cues in thick descriptions of specific social welfare recipients.

Author's Keywords:

Personality Differences, Imagination, Heuristics
Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: ISPP 34th Annual Scientific Meeting
URL:
http://ispp.org


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p510692_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Petersen, Michael. and Aaroe, Lene. "Imagining Politics: How Individual Differences in Imagination Shapes Public Opinion Formation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISPP 34th Annual Scientific Meeting, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey, Jul 09, 2011 <Not Available>. 2014-11-25 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p510692_index.html>

APA Citation:

Petersen, M. B. and Aaroe, L. , 2011-07-09 "Imagining Politics: How Individual Differences in Imagination Shapes Public Opinion Formation" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISPP 34th Annual Scientific Meeting, Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey <Not Available>. 2014-11-25 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p510692_index.html

Publication Type: Paper (prepared oral presentation)
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: We argue that citizens compensate for the scarcity of information in mass politics by recruiting cognitive systems designed for the internal generation of stimuli; or, in simpler terms, by use of imagination. We test this argument in the context of two nationally representative surveys of Danish and US citizens using both survey experiments and correlational analysis. Here, we provide cross-national evidence for the assertion that personality differences in imagination (cf. the IPIP inventory) influence how and how easily citizens form political attitudes. As test case we focus on the issue of social welfare. Empirically, we demonstrate that imaginative individuals hold more extreme opinions on social welfare and that this effects occurs through two pathways: First, imagination regulates how easily individuals can spontaneously generate associations about the deservingness of social welfare recipients in situations of cue scarcity. Hence, imaginative individuals list more associations about social welfare recipients in free recall tasks and are more strongly guided by their priors when reacting to thin descriptions of specific social welfare recipients. Second, imagination regulates how vividly individuals experience the available cues and associations. Hence, the emotional reactions of imaginative individuals are more strongly guided by morally-relevant associations about social welfare recipients and imaginative individuals react more strongly to morally-relevant cues in thick descriptions of specific social welfare recipients.


Similar Titles:
The Different Ways We Think about Politics: _x000d_A Multi-Method Study of Individual Differences in Political Cognition

Media and Opinion Formation in the Public Sphere: A New Theory of Deliberative Politics

Paradoxes of Public Opinion: How Political Actors View Public Opinion on Penal Issues


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.