All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Media Portrayals of Mental Illness and the Third-Person Effect
Unformatted Document Text:  M c K e e v e r - P a g e | 13 participants were asked questions related to attitudes toward mentally ill individuals, most respondents scored rather low on the index created to measure stigma (M = 1.45, SD =.635), indicating overall there were low levels of stigma associated with mental illness. [Insert Table 1 Here] To assess beliefs about media portrayals, respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with statements, also measured on a 5-point scale, which was adopted from prior research assessing student attitudes about media portrayals of mental illness following the Virginia Tech shootings. 44 The mean scores (M = 3.627, SD = .721), revealed general perceptions of media portrayals of mental illness as being undesirable. Overall 60% agreed with the statement “media depictions of mental illness are usually negative,” while 74% disagreed with the statement, “individuals with mental illnesses are usually portrayed positively by the media” (see Table 2). Student attitudes about the treatment of mental illnesses were measured in a similar fashion, using the mean score (each item on a 5-point scale) of responses to items on the four-item treatment attitude scale (α =.84). 45 The results indicated that student beliefs about the treatability of mental illnesses, were, on average, positive (M = 3.7, SD = .58). [Insert Table 2 Here] In terms of student beliefs about the societal prevalence of mental illness, respondents estimated that 25.4% of the general public and 22.07% of the campus suffered from some form of mental illness (Table 3). A paired t-test confirmed that there were significant differences between student estimations regarding the general public (M=25.4, SD=12.23) and other members of the campus community, (M=22.07, SD=13.73); t (177) = 5.44, p<.0005 (two-tailed). Thus, H1, which expected student estimates of the prevalence of mental illness to be lower for members of the campus community, was supported.

Authors: McKeever, Robert.
first   previous   Page 14 of 30   next   last

background image
M c K e e v e r   -   P a g e  | 13 
participants were asked questions related to attitudes toward mentally ill individuals, most 
respondents scored rather low on the index created to measure stigma (M = 1.45, SD =.635), 
indicating overall there were low levels of stigma associated with mental illness.  
[Insert Table 1 Here] 
To assess beliefs about media portrayals, respondents were asked to rate their level of 
agreement with statements, also measured on a 5-point scale, which was adopted from prior 
research assessing student attitudes about media portrayals of mental illness following the 
Virginia Tech shootings.
 The mean scores (= 3.627, SD = .721), revealed general 
perceptions of media portrayals of mental illness as being undesirable. Overall 60% agreed with 
the statement “media depictions of mental illness are usually negative,” while 74% disagreed 
with the statement, “individuals with mental illnesses are usually portrayed positively by the 
media” (see Table 2). Student attitudes about the treatment of mental illnesses were measured in 
a similar fashion, using the mean score (each item on a 5-point scale) of responses to items on 
the four-item treatment attitude scale (α =.84).
 The results indicated that student beliefs about 
the treatability of mental illnesses, were, on average, positive (M = 3.7, SD = .58).  
[Insert Table 2 Here] 
In terms of student beliefs about the societal prevalence of mental illness, respondents 
estimated that 25.4% of the general public and 22.07% of the campus suffered from some form 
of mental illness (Table 3). A paired t-test confirmed that there were significant differences 
between student estimations regarding the general public (M=25.4, SD=12.23) and other 
members of the campus community, (M=22.07, SD=13.73); (177) = 5.44, p<.0005 (two-tailed).  
Thus, H1, which expected student estimates of the prevalence of mental illness to be lower for 
members of the campus community, was supported.  

Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 14 of 30   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.