All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Back to the Future: Uses of History in Newspapers and Judicial Records on Marriage Equality
Unformatted Document Text:  to procreate.” Id. at 956. “Cott: Historically, legitimating children was a very important function of marriage, especially among propertied families. Today, legitimation is less important.” Id. at 961. 105 Def.-Intervenors’ Trial Mem., supra note 78, 1:3-5. 106 Id. 107 Id. at 3:4-5. 108 “The evidence did not show any historical purpose for excluding same-sex couples from marriage, as states have never required spouses to have an ability or willingness to procreate in order to marry. Rather, the exclusion exists as an artifact of a time when the genders were seen as having distinct roles in society and in marriage. That time has passed.” See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 993. “Cott: The move to no-fault divorce underlines the fact that marriage no longer requires specific performance of one marital role or another based on gender.” Id. at 959. Also: “One of Walker's strongest points was that traditional notions of marriage can no longer be used to justify discrimination, just as gender roles in opposite-sex marriage have changed dramatically over the decades.” Editorial, Marriage Is a Constitutional Right, N.Y. T IMES , Aug. 5, 2010, at A26. 109 See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 975. 110 Id. at 945. 111 Supporters of the proposition did imply, at one point in the trial memorandum, that marriage occupies a special social space: “[B]oth historically and today, many societies and governments—throughout the United States and the world—that embrace same-sex relationships and/or strongly affirm gay and lesbian rights have nevertheless determined that same-sex relationships should not be recognized as marriages.” Def.-Intervenors’ Trial Mem., 13:23-24, supra note 82, 14:1-2. Their statement could be interpreted to be an acknowledgement of the unique symbolism of marriage as constructed by supporters of marriage equality, or it could be interpreted to be a concession made in order to avoid sounding discriminatory. As Robert Shrum, a senior adviser to John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign, told the New York Times, ''People have got … increasingly uncomfortable with the idea of rank discrimination based on someone's sexuality.” Jesse McKinley, Gay Marriage Hits ’10 Race, N.Y. T IMES , Aug. 6, 2010, at A10. 112 See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 939. 113 Id. 114 Id. at 936, 939, 972. 115 Id. at 939-40. 116 Id. at 970. 117 Id. 118 Id. at 971. 119 “Proposition 8 had a peculiar effect: it removed only the honored stature of ‘marriage’ from same-sex couples, yet altered none of their state constitutional rights to the traditional incidents of marriage, including the right to form a family and raise children.” See Resp. Br., supra note 103, at 1:15-18. 120 “The vote was the latest in a succession of setbacks for advocates of gay marriage across the country. … Last month, a similar measure was defeated in New York’s Legislature, and in November voters in Maine repealed a gay-marriage law in a referendum.” David Kocieniewski, Odds Against Gay Marriage Grow With Setback in Trenton, N.Y. T IMES , Jan. 5, 2010, at A16. “The case was initially met with skepticism by some in the gay rights community, who feared that a loss at a federal level could set back their efforts to gain wider recognition for same-sex marriage, which is legal in five states and the District of Columbia.” Jesse McKinley, Tart Questions at Same-Sex Marriage Trial’s Closing, N.Y. T IMES , Jun. 17, 2010, at A15. “The district’s decision to allow same-sex marriage is a victory for gay and lesbian rights groups after successive defeats of legislation in New York, Maine and Texas and the upholding of Proposition 8 in California last year. Gay marriages have been legalized in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut and Vermont.” See Tan, supra note 75. 121 See Editorial, supra note 108. 122 A comparison of Loving, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), and Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003). 123 Jesse McKinley & John Schwartz, CALIFORNIA’S BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE IS STRUCK DOWN, N.Y. T IMES , Aug. 5, 2010, at A1. 124 Ross Douthat, The Marriage Ideal, N.Y. T IMES , Aug. 9, 2010, at A19. 125 Id. 126 See McKinley & Schwartz, supra note 123. Jon Cowan & Evan Wolfson, A GOP Surprise; The Republican Party has quietly dropped its usual anti-gay election-year demagoguery, L.A. T IMES , Oct. 13, 2010, at A 21. 127 “As head of the Republican National Committee, Mr. Mehlman advocated the Bush administration's push for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, which Republicans had hoped would galvanize the party's conservative base in 2006.” Kate Zernike, Conservatives’ Focus on Fiscal Matters Means Few Care About a Gay Republican, N.Y. T IMES , Aug. 27, 2010, at A9. 128 “Richard Socarides, who advised President Bill Clinton on gay rights issues, said that this decision could be used as a rallying cry for Republicans again.” See McKinley & Schwartz, supra note 123. 129 See McKinley, supra note 111. Also, “Brian S. Brown, the executive director of the National Organization for Marriage … called the decision the beginning of a ‘major national culture war.’” Id. 130 Sheryl Gay Stolberg, After Fall of ‘Don’t Ask,’ Pushing for ‘I Do, N.Y. T IMES , Dec. 21, 2010, at A22. 131 The discourse has shifted away from individually elected public officials: “Had a former chairman of the

Authors: Li, Anqi.
first   previous   Page 29 of 31   next   last

background image
to procreate.” Id. at 956. “Cott: Historically, legitimating children was a very important function of marriage, especially 
among propertied families. Today, legitimation is less important.” Id. at 961. 
 Def.-Intervenors’ Trial Mem., supra note 78, 1:3-5. 
 Id. at 3:4-5.
 “The evidence did not show any historical purpose for excluding same-sex couples from marriage, as states 
have never required spouses to have an ability or willingness to procreate in order to marry. Rather, the exclusion exists 
as an artifact of a time when the genders were seen as having distinct roles in society and in marriage. That time has 
passed.” See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 993. “Cott: The move to no-fault divorce underlines the fact that marriage no longer 
requires specific performance of one marital role or another based on gender.” Id. at 959. Also: “One of Walker's 
strongest points was that traditional notions of marriage can no longer be used to justify discrimination, just as gender 
roles in opposite-sex marriage have changed dramatically over the decades.” Editorial, Marriage Is a Constitutional 
, N.Y. T
, Aug. 5, 2010, at A26.
 See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 975.
 Id. at 945.
 Supporters of the proposition did imply, at one point in the trial memorandum, that marriage occupies a 
special social space: “[B]oth historically and today, many societies and governments—throughout the United States and 
the world—that embrace same-sex relationships and/or strongly affirm gay and lesbian rights have nevertheless 
determined that same-sex relationships should not be recognized as marriages.” Def.-Intervenors’ Trial Mem., 13:23-
24, supra note 82, 14:1-2. Their statement could be interpreted to be an acknowledgement of the unique symbolism of 
marriage as constructed by supporters of marriage equality, or it could be interpreted to be a concession made in order 
to avoid sounding discriminatory. As Robert Shrum, a senior adviser to John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign, told 
the New York Times, ''People have got … increasingly uncomfortable with the idea of rank discrimination based on 
someone's sexuality.” Jesse McKinley, Gay Marriage Hits ’10 Race, N.Y. T
, Aug. 6, 2010, at A10.
 See Perry, 704 F. Supp. at 939.
 Id. at 936, 939, 972. 
 Id. at 939-40.
 Id. at 970.
 Id. at 971. 
 “Proposition 8 had a peculiar effect: it removed only the honored stature of ‘marriage’ from same-sex 
couples, yet altered none of their state constitutional rights to the traditional incidents of marriage, including the right to 
form a family and raise children.” See Resp. Br., supra note 103, at 1:15-18.
 “The vote was the latest in a succession of setbacks for advocates of gay marriage across the country. … 
Last month, a similar measure was defeated in New York’s Legislature, and in November voters in Maine repealed a 
gay-marriage law in a referendum.”
David Kocieniewski, Odds Against Gay Marriage Grow With Setback in Trenton
N.Y. T
, Jan. 5, 2010, at A16.  “The case was initially met with skepticism by some in the gay rights community, 
who feared that a loss at a federal level could set back their efforts to gain wider recognition for same-sex marriage, 
which is legal in five states and the District of Columbia.” Jesse McKinley, Tart Questions at Same-Sex Marriage 
Trial’s Closing
, N.Y. T
, Jun. 17, 2010, at A15. “The district’s decision to allow same-sex marriage is a victory for 
gay and lesbian rights groups after successive defeats of legislation in New York, Maine and Texas and the upholding 
of Proposition 8 in California last year. Gay marriages have been legalized in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Iowa, 
Connecticut and Vermont.” See Tan, supra note 75.
 See Editorial, supra note 108.
 A comparison of Loving, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), and Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003). 
Aug. 5, 2010, at A1.
 Ross Douthat, The Marriage Ideal, N.Y. T
, Aug. 9, 2010, at A19. 
 See McKinley & Schwartz, supra note 123. Jon Cowan & Evan Wolfson, A GOP Surprise; The Republican 
Party has quietly dropped its usual anti-gay election-year demagoguery, L.A. T
, Oct. 13, 2010, at A 21. 
 “As head of the Republican National Committee, Mr. Mehlman advocated the Bush administration's push 
for a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, which Republicans had hoped would galvanize the party's 
conservative base in 2006.” Kate Zernike, Conservatives’ Focus on Fiscal Matters Means Few Care About a Gay  
, N.Y. T
, Aug. 27, 2010, at A9. 
 “Richard Socarides, who advised President Bill Clinton on gay rights issues, said that this decision could be 
used as a rallying cry for Republicans again.” See McKinley & Schwartz, supra note 123.
 See McKinley, supra note 111. Also, “Brian S. Brown, the executive director of the National Organization 
for Marriage … called the decision the beginning of a ‘major national culture war.’” Id.
 Sheryl Gay Stolberg, After Fall of ‘Don’t Ask,’ Pushing for ‘I Do, N.Y. T
, Dec. 21, 2010, at A22.
 The discourse has shifted away from individually elected public officials: “Had a former chairman of the 

All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 31   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.