All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Elaboration, content preference and framing: Effects of “Incompetent Authority” frame in China-made product recall coverage
Unformatted Document Text:  Elaboration, content preference and framing Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of sources versus message cues in persuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39, 752-756. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. Cohen, P.A. (1961). The anti-Christian tradition in China. The Journal of Asian Studies, 20(2), 169-180. de Vreese, C. H. (2002). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic. Donati, A. (1992). Political discourse analysis. In M. Diani & R. Eyerman (Eds.), Studying Collective Action (pp. 136-167). London: Sage. Druckman, J.N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. Senate election. Political Psychology, 25, 577-594. Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2009). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about emergent technologies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3-6. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K.R. (2003). Framing and deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 728-744. Eagly, H. A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.

Authors: Pan, Ji.
first   previous   Page 20 of 34   next   last



background image
Elaboration, content preference and framing
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of 
sources versus message cues in persuation. Journal of Personality and Social 
Psychology,39, 752-756.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science
10, 103-126.
Cohen, P.A. (1961). The anti-Christian tradition in China. The Journal of Asian Studies
20(2), 169-180. 
de Vreese, C. H. (2002). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration
Amsterdam: Aksant  Academic.
Donati, A. (1992). Political discourse analysis. In M. Diani & R. Eyerman (Eds.), Studying 
Collective Action (pp. 136-167). London: Sage.
Druckman, J.N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of 
Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
Druckman, J. N. (2004). Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. Senate election. 
Political Psychology, 25, 577-594.
Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2009). Framing, motivated reasoning, and opinions about 
emergent technologies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American 
Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3-6.
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K.R. (2003). Framing and deliberation. American Journal of 
Political Science, 47, 728-744.
Eagly, H. A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt 
Brace College.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 20 of 34   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.