All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Communication Mediation Model of Late-Night Comedy
Unformatted Document Text:  COMMUNICATION MEDIATION MODEL OF LATE-NIGHT COMEDY 28 participation? Survey evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research. McClurg, S. D. (2006a). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 737-754. McClurg, S. D. (2006b). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28(4), 349-366. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315-336. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. D., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., . . . Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation. Communication Research, 26(6), 743-774. McLeod, J. M., Zubric, J., Keum, H., Deshpande, S., Cho, J., & Stein, S., et al. (2001). Reflecting and connecting: Testing a communication mediation model of civic participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington D.C. Min, S.-J. (2007). Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1369-1387. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8(2), 111-131. Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 111-126. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K.-H., & Shen, L. (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance Communication Monographs, 70(1), 39-51. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. Price, V., & Cappella, J. N. (2002). Online deliberation and its influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1), 303-329. Putnam, R. D., & Yonish, S. (1999). How important is response rate? An evaluation of a "mail panel" survey archive. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Saint Pete Beach, FL. Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46-65. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728-753. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., & Brossard, D. (2003). Pathways to political participation? Religion, communication contexts, and mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(3), 300-324.

Authors: Lee, Hoon.
first   previous   Page 29 of 33   next   last



background image
COMMUNICATION MEDIATION MODEL OF LATE-NIGHT COMEDY
  28
participation? Survey evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research
McClurg, S. D. (2006a). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and 
expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of 
Political Science, 50
(3), 737-754. 
McClurg, S. D. (2006b). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of 
neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political 
Behavior, 28
(4), 349-366. 
McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and 
participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political 
participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315-336. 
McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. D., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., . . . 
Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation. Communication Research, 26(6), 743-774. 
McLeod, J. M., Zubric, J., Keum, H., Deshpande, S., Cho, J., & Stein, S., et al. (2001). 
Reflecting and connecting: Testing a communication mediation model of civic  
participation
. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in 
Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington D.C. 
Min, S.-J. (2007). Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of 
Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1369-1387. 
Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the 
political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8(2), 111-131. 
Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. 
American Political Science Review, 96(2), 111-126. 
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy
Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago, IL: 
University of Chicago Press.
Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K.-H., & Shen, L. (2003). 
Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance 
Communication Monographs, 70(1), 39-51. 
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and 
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 
40
(3), 879-891. 
Price, V., & Cappella, J. N. (2002). Online deliberation and its influence: The Electronic 
Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000. IT & Society, 1(1), 303-329. 
Putnam, R. D., & Yonish, S. (1999). How important is response rate? An evaluation of a "mail 
panel" survey archive. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the American 
Association for Public Opinion Research, Saint Pete Beach, FL. 
Scheufele, D. A. (2002). Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications 
for participatory behavior. Communication Research, 29(1), 46-65. 
Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2006). 
Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, 
heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of 
Communication, 56
(4), 728-753. 
Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., & Brossard, D. (2003). Pathways to political participation? 
Religion, communication contexts, and mass media. International Journal of Public 
Opinion Research, 15
(3), 300-324. 


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 33   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.