All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

Technological Constructions of Reality: An Ontological Perspective
Unformatted Document Text:  Running Head: TECHNOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY maintenance, specifically in dealing with disagreements and household duties. Chory and Banfield concluded that media dependence might have a harmful effect on interpersonal relationships. With the growing body of empirical research in support of MSD theory, theoretical strengths become apparent that include its attempt to address both microscopic and macroscopic media effects, its explanation of media dependency during times of crisis and social change (Baran & Davis, 2006), and its exploration of motivations for individual media dependency. However, it fails to address the context of the role of technology itself, which also is a determining factor for media use and dependency. This theory also lacks explanations for long- term media effects and how those shape audience behaviors and attitudes toward media dependency. Overall, media-system dependency theory does help to explain individual dependency of media and its repercussions on cognitive, affective and behavioral changes in individuals but fails to address the shifts in generational cohorts and the role of technology in constructing reality. Filling in the Gaps: A Technological Ontological Perspective The theories discussed here build a theoretical foundation to build the argument that interaction with and dependency on media help to shape our constructions of reality but do not specifically focus on the role of technology. Medium theory helps to explain the role of media and how the context of the medium shapes the message individuals perceive. On the other hand, MSD theory looks at how individuals come to rely on the messages the media convey in a perpetuating cycle of dependency on media. Social constructionism addresses both context and meaning of messages in shaping constructs of reality, but when applied to media solely focuses on the impact of meanings conveyed through mainstream media. Combined, these theories 14

Authors: Vincent, Cindy.
first   previous   Page 14 of 32   next   last

background image
maintenance, specifically in dealing with disagreements and household duties.  Chory and 
Banfield concluded that media dependence might have a harmful effect on interpersonal 
With the growing body of empirical research in support of MSD theory, theoretical 
strengths become apparent that include its attempt to address both microscopic and macroscopic 
media effects, its explanation of media dependency during times of crisis and social change 
(Baran & Davis, 2006), and its exploration of motivations for individual media dependency. 
However, it fails to address the context of the role of technology itself, which also is a 
determining factor for media use and dependency.  This theory also lacks explanations for long-
term media effects and how those shape audience behaviors and attitudes toward media 
dependency.  Overall, media-system dependency theory does help to explain individual 
dependency of media and its repercussions on cognitive, affective and behavioral changes in 
individuals but fails to address the shifts in generational cohorts and the role of technology in 
constructing reality.
Filling in the Gaps: A Technological Ontological Perspective
The theories discussed here build a theoretical foundation to build the argument that 
interaction with and dependency on media help to shape our constructions of reality but do not 
specifically focus on the role of technology.  Medium theory helps to explain the role of media 
and how the context of the medium shapes the message individuals perceive.  On the other hand, 
MSD theory looks at how individuals come to rely on the messages the media convey in a 
perpetuating cycle of dependency on media.  Social constructionism addresses both context and 
meaning of messages in shaping constructs of reality, but when applied to media solely focuses 
on the impact of meanings conveyed through mainstream media.  Combined, these theories 

All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 14 of 32   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.