All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Teaching Millennials to Engage THE Environment instead of THEIR Environment: A Pedagogical Analysis
Unformatted Document Text:  1 Everette E. Dennis, “In Context: Environmentalism in the System of News,” in Craig L. LaMay and Everette E. Dennis, eds. Media and the Environment (Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1991): 61. 2 Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: Free Press, 1986); George Gerbner, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan and Nancy Signorielli, “Scientists on the TV Screen,” Society 18 (May/June 1981): 41-44; Susanna Hornig, “Science Stories: Risk, Power and Perceived Emphasis,” Journalism Quarterly 67 (winter 1990): 767-776; Marcel C. LaFollette, Making Science Our Own: Public Images of Science, 1910-1955 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995). 3 Michael X. Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter, What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996). 4 Everette E. Dennis and James McCartney, “Science Journalists on Metropolitan Dailies: Methods, Values and Perceptions of Their Work,” Journal of Environmental Education, 10 (spring 1979): 9-15. 5 Author, 2010. 6 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2009). Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media.Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 7 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004). The State of the News Media 2004: An Annual Report on American Journalism. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 8 Nelkin, Selling Science, 7. 9 Julie Suleski, (2010). “Scientists are Talking, But Mostly to Each Other: a Quantitative Analysis of Research Represented in Mass Media.” Public Understanding of Science, 19 (January 2010): 115-125. 10 Clyde Z. Nunn, “Readership and Coverage of Science and Technology in Newspapers,” Journalism Quarterly 56 (spring 1979): 27-30. 11 Sharon M. Friedman, “The Journalist’s World,” in Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, eds. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News (New York: Free Press, 1986): 17-41. 12 Bruce V. Lewenstein, “Was There Really a Popular Science 'Boom'?” Science, Technology & Human Values 12 (spring 1987): 29-41. 13 Fred Jerome, “For Newspaper Science Sections: Hard Times,” SIPIscope 20 (1992): 2-4. 14 James W. Tankard and Michael Ryan, “News Source Perception of Accuracy of Science Coverage,” Journalism Quarterly 51 (summer 1974): 219-225. 15 Phillip J. Tichenor, Clarice N. Olien, Annette Harrison, and George Donahue, “Mass Communication Systems and Communication Accuracy in Science News Reporting,”

Authors: Stevens, Rick. and Crow, Deserai.
first   previous   Page 18 of 21   next   last



background image
1
 Everette E. Dennis, “In Context: Environmentalism in the System of News,” in Craig L. 
LaMay and Everette E. Dennis, eds. Media and the Environment (Washington D.C.: Island 
Press, 1991): 61.
2
 Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, Scientists and Journalists: 
Reporting Science as News
 (New York: Free Press, 1986); George Gerbner, Larry Gross, 
Michael Morgan and Nancy Signorielli, “Scientists on the TV Screen,” Society 18 
(May/June 1981): 41-44; Susanna Hornig, “Science Stories: Risk, Power and Perceived 
Emphasis,” Journalism Quarterly 67 (winter 1990): 767-776; Marcel C. LaFollette, Making 
Science Our Own: Public Images of Science, 1910-1955
 (Chicago: University of Chicago 
Press, 1990); Dorothy Nelkin, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and 
Technology
 (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1995). 
3
 Michael X. Delli Carpini and Scott Keeter, What Americans Know About Politics and Why  
It Matters
 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996).
4
 Everette E. Dennis and James McCartney, “Science Journalists on Metropolitan Dailies: 
Methods, Values and Perceptions of Their Work,” Journal of Environmental Education, 10 
(spring 1979): 9-15.
5
 Author, 2010.
6
 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2009). Public Praises Science; 
Scientists Fault Public, Media.
Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center for the People and 
the Press.
7
 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.  (2004). The State of the News Media 
2004: An Annual Report on American Journalism.
 Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center 
for the People and the Press.
8
 Nelkin, Selling Science, 7.
9
 Julie Suleski, (2010). “Scientists are Talking, But Mostly to Each Other: a Quantitative 
Analysis of Research Represented in Mass Media.” Public Understanding of Science, 19 
(January 2010): 115-125.
10
 Clyde Z. Nunn, “Readership and Coverage of Science and Technology in Newspapers,” 
Journalism Quarterly 56 (spring 1979): 27-30.
11
 Sharon M. Friedman, “The Journalist’s World,” in Sharon M. Friedman, Sharon 
Dunwoody, and Carol L. Rogers, eds. Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News 
(New York: Free Press, 1986): 17-41.
12
 Bruce V. Lewenstein, “Was There Really a Popular Science 'Boom'?” Science, Technology 
& Human Values
 12 (spring 1987): 29-41.
13
 Fred Jerome, “For Newspaper Science Sections: Hard Times,” SIPIscope 20 (1992): 2-4.
14
 James W. Tankard and Michael Ryan, “News Source Perception of Accuracy of Science 
Coverage,” Journalism Quarterly 51 (summer 1974): 219-225.
15
 Phillip J. Tichenor, Clarice N. Olien, Annette Harrison, and George Donahue, “Mass 
Communication Systems and Communication Accuracy in Science News Reporting,” 


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 18 of 21   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.