All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.

The Psychology of Plagiarism
Unformatted Document Text:  was based on a study that drew 40 pairs 52 from adjectives that ranked high in Goldberg’s seminal factor analysis. 53 Each adjective in the pair was placed at opposite ends of a line, with the numbers one through seven between them. Respondents were instructed to pick the number on the continuum between each adjective pair that best described them, with the numbers forming a 7-point Likert scale. The 40 adjective pairs, with eight for each element of the Big Five, were: for extroversion, passive-active, unenergetic-energetic, submissive-dominant, timid-bold, conforming-independent, humble-proud, quiet- talkative and retiring-sociable; for agreeableness, cold-warm, disagreeable-agreeable, critical-lenient, stubborn-flexible, suspicious-trusting, unfair-fair, selfish-selfless and stingy-generous; for conscientiousness, undependable-reliable, negligent-conscientious, careless-careful, disorganized--well-organized, lazy-hard working, untraditional- traditional, liberal-conservative and impractical-practical; for neuroticism, emotionally unstable-emotionally stable, insecure-secure, nervous-at ease, high strung-relaxed, temperamental-even tempered, emotional-unemotional, envious-not envious and subjective-objective; and for openness, uncultured-cultured, ignorant-knowledgeable, stupid-intelligent, imperceptive-perceptive, uncreative-creative, simple-complex, uncurious-curious, and unanalytical-analytical. The neuroticism rankings were reverse- scored so that the strength of the scores would parallel the other four measures and reflect the concept of emotional stability. The adjective pairs were listed alphabetically in the survey to inject a measure of randomness. The primary dependent variable was measured by a question asking respondents how often they had plagiarized in the previous two years, without defining the offense. The absence of a definition undoubtedly understated the frequency of plagiarism by

Authors: Lewis, Norman. and Zhong, Bu.
first   previous   Page 9 of 21   next   last

background image
was based on a study that drew 40 pairs
 from adjectives that ranked high in Goldberg’s 
seminal factor analysis.
 Each adjective in the pair was placed at opposite ends of a line, 
with the numbers one through seven between them. Respondents were instructed to pick 
the number on the continuum between each adjective pair that best described them, with 
the numbers forming a 7-point Likert scale. The 40 adjective pairs, with eight for each 
element of the Big Five, were: for extroversion, passive-active, unenergetic-energetic, 
submissive-dominant, timid-bold, conforming-independent, humble-proud, quiet-
talkative and retiring-sociable; for agreeableness, cold-warm, disagreeable-agreeable, 
critical-lenient, stubborn-flexible, suspicious-trusting, unfair-fair, selfish-selfless and 
stingy-generous; for conscientiousness, undependable-reliable, negligent-conscientious, 
careless-careful, disorganized--well-organized, lazy-hard working, untraditional-
traditional, liberal-conservative and impractical-practical; for neuroticism, emotionally 
unstable-emotionally stable, insecure-secure, nervous-at ease, high strung-relaxed, 
temperamental-even tempered, emotional-unemotional, envious-not envious and 
subjective-objective; and for openness, uncultured-cultured, ignorant-knowledgeable, 
stupid-intelligent, imperceptive-perceptive, uncreative-creative, simple-complex, 
uncurious-curious, and unanalytical-analytical. The neuroticism rankings were reverse-
scored so that the strength of the scores would parallel the other four measures and reflect 
the concept of emotional stability. The adjective pairs were listed alphabetically in the 
survey to inject a measure of randomness. 
The primary dependent variable was measured by a question asking respondents 
how often they had plagiarized in the previous two years, without defining the offense. 
The absence of a definition undoubtedly understated the frequency of plagiarism by 

Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 21   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.