Guest  

 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Showing 1 through 5 of 1,722 records.
Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 345 - Next  Jump:
2017 - ICA's 67th Annual Conference Pages: unavailable || Words: unavailable || 
Info
1. Lee, Jiyoung. "Hasty Discussion, Cross-Cutting Exposure, and Tolerance: A Comparative Study of South Korean and American Online Discussants" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ICA's 67th Annual Conference, Hilton San Diego Bayfront, San Diego, USA, May 25, 2017 Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2020-02-18 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1228141_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: The positive relationship between cross-cutting exposure and tolerance has long been a topic in the political communication field. By reinvestigating this issue, this study further explores whether “hasty” discussion moderates the relationship from a cross-cultural perspective by comparing South Korea with the United States. The authors posit that hasty discussion—a term that was coined to explain South Korean’s fast lifestyle as reflected in discussion processes—is a South Korean characteristic that can have deleterious effects on deliberative democracy. Nine hundred and sixty survey participants (480 South Koreans, 480 Americans) showed meaningful results: 1) Hasty discussion comprises two factors (ignoring discussion processes and pursuing discussion efficiency). 2) Americans are exposed to more cross-cutting opinions than South Koreans, but the positive relationship between cross-cutting exposure and tolerance is more significant in the South Korean sample. 3) In the South Korean sample, ignoring discussion processes negatively affected tolerance. 4) An interaction effect of ignoring discussion processes and cross-cutting exposure on tolerance was found among South Koreans. That is, ignoring the discussion process lowered tolerance.

2015 - Accelerate Learning: Racing into the Future - AECT Words: 99 words || 
Info
2. Oh, Eunjung Grace., Huang, Wen-hao David. and Hedayati Mehdiabadi, Amir. "Critical Thinking In Asynchronous Online Discussions: The Effects Of Peer-redirection vs. Instructor-redirection in Ethical Decision-Making Discussions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Accelerate Learning: Racing into the Future - AECT, Hyatt Regency, Indianapolis, Indiana, Nov 03, 2015 <Not Available>. 2020-02-18 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1017904_index.html>
Publication Type: Concurrent Presentation
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This session will present a qualitative study, to delineate the effects of peer- and instructor-redirection on adult learners’ critical thinking in online discussions. Situated in developing adult learners’ ethical thinking capacities, a content analysis of learner asynchronous online discussion postings, grounded in a Cognitive Presence framework from a Community of Inquiry model, revealed learners’ levels of critical thinking and the effects of redirection messages by peer and instructor. Discussion will focus on first, the design of online discussion facilitation strategies to promote learners’ critical thinking. The second part emphasizes the versatility of applying such strategies in teaching ethical thinking.

2015 - International Communication Association 65th Annual Conference Pages: unavailable || Words: 8051 words || 
Info
3. Hong, Yangsun. "Gendered Political Discussion and Intersectional Construction of Women’s Political Discussion Networks" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association 65th Annual Conference, Caribe Hilton, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 21, 2015 Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2020-02-18 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p982360_index.html>
Publication Type: Session Paper
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This article attempts to critically analyze the naively but widely accepted findings in the field of political communication about gender difference in political discussion based on feminist perspectives. The current study suggests the concept of discussion opportunity structure, which shows the gendered construction of political discussion network. It implies that political discussion takes place based on reciprocal interactions with people, which are inevitably consequences of gender relations, or social structural positions in general. Using this concept, I tries to identify the gendered discussion network as a result of women’s limited positions in the discussion opportunity structure in three ways: gender segregation, social segregation, and ideological segregation. Then, I suggest feminist intersectionality as a promising framework for examining gender difference in research on politics. I conclude that gender differences in political discussion arise not because women are essentially different from men in terms of psychological traits like avoidance of conflict, having more generous attitude toward others’ opinion -as political communication scholars often argue-, but because of the structural, situational, and institutional factors that construct women’s discussion networks, which are inevitably sexually, socially, and ideologically segregated.

2018 - Literacy Research Association Annual Conference Pages: unavailable || Words: unavailable || 
Info
4. Fullerton, Susan. and Hubbard, Koti. "Time and Power to Discuss Racial Injustice and Bullying: Four Third-Grade Communities Discuss Mr. Lincoln’s Way" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Literacy Research Association Annual Conference, Renaissance Esmeralda Indian Wells Resort & Spa, Indian Wells, CA, Nov 27, 2018 Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2020-02-18 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1405115_index.html>
Publication Type: Roundtable
Review Method: Peer Reviewed

2005 - International Communication Association Pages: 30 pages || Words: 6848 words || 
Info
5. Hardy, Bruce. "Political Discussion and Democratic Citizenship: Comparing Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Political Discussion as Promoters of Active Citizenry" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY, Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2020-02-18 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p11888_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Political communication scholars have put forward contrasting theories and produced contradictory evidence in attempts to explain the impact of heterogeneity of political discussion on active citizenship. However, most of these studies examined the effects of heterogeneous discussion independently of homogenous discussion. This is overly simplistic, of course, given that most citizens are likely to be mobilized through discussion with both likeminded and non-likeminded discussion partners. This study examines the opposing claims on the civic consequences of heterogeneous political discussion empirically and directly compares the influence of heterogeneous and homogeneous political discussion on indicators of active citizenship. Overall, two general findings emerged. First, heterogeneous political discussion does encourage democratic citizenship and, second, heterogeneous political discussion and homogeneous political discussion have different effects on indicators of active citizenship.

Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 345 - Next  Jump:

©2020 All Academic, Inc.   |   All Academic Privacy Policy