Guest  

 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Showing 1 through 5 of 283 records.
Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 57 - Next  Jump:
2012 - The Mathematical Association of America MathFest Words: 46 words || 
Info
1. Allen, Sabrina. "On 2-fold $G$-designs where $G$ has order at most 4 and edge-multiplicity 2" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Mathematical Association of America MathFest, Monona Terrace Convention Center, Madison, WI, Aug 02, 2012 <Not Available>. 2019-10-14 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p601628_index.html>
Publication Type: Student Paper
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: For a positive integer $k$, let $^{2}K_k$ denote the $2$-fold complete mutigraph of order $k$. If $G$ is a bipartite subgraph of $^2K_4$, we find necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of $G$-decompositions of $^2K_n$. We also report on some results when $G$ is tripartite.

2018 - Northeastern Political Science Association Words: 239 words || 
Info
2. Korkmaz, Hatun. "The Effects of Dıgıtal Era on Publıc Admınıstratıon: From Government to Dıgıtal Governance" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Bonaventure Hotel, Montreal, Canada, Nov 08, 2018 <Not Available>. 2019-10-14 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1425794_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Digital technologies profoundly influenced social, political and economic areas. This influence reached public administration since the beginning 1980s with major consequences for the interactions between citizens and public administration.
Over the last 100 years, governments have been designed along the lines of Weberian model which is characterised generally by paperbased systems, formal written files and command and control in large hierarchical structures.
From the 1980s to the early 2000s, the New Public Management (NPM) model dominated the toolkit of public management reform. To varying extents in different countries, NPM variants of managerialist modernization emphasized disaggregation of large-scale departments, increased competition within the public sector, and the incentivization of public officials along business lines. In this model, digital technologies were also marginalized, after an initial tokenistic information technology adoption aimed at better service delivery.
From the 2000s, models of bureaucracy with digital technologies at the centre became viable. Digital Era Governance is based on the complete digitalization of paper and phone-based systems; a citizen-based holism where services are reorganized around digitally enabled citizens; and a reintegration of governmental organizations fragmented after years of NPM change.
Digital technologies profoundly influenced social, political and economic areas. This influence reached public administration since the beginning 1980s with major consequences for the interactions between citizens and public administration.
In this paper, the evolutıon of the public administration is examined around the political, orgaisational and social issues and will mainly focus on digitalization.
Key Words: Governance, digital governance, Digital era governance.

2011 - International Studies Association Annual Conference "Global Governance: Political Authority in Transition" Pages: 9 pages || Words: 3075 words || 
Info
3. Morgan, Matthew. and Teke, Armagan. "The Transition from the G-8 to G-20: The Reproduction of Orthodoxy or the Emergence of a New Financial Model?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association Annual Conference "Global Governance: Political Authority in Transition", Le Centre Sheraton Montreal Hotel, MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA, Mar 16, 2011 Online <PDF>. 2019-10-14 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p501956_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: The rapid shift from the G-8 to the G-20 as the world's premier economic and policy making body occurred suddenly and as a response to the outbreak of the 2008 financial crisis. The expansion of this insular body to incorporate members beyond Western powers represents, we believe, the central plank of a project to reorient the hegemony of financial orthodoxy upon a wider base of support. While the inclusion of these new member states will undoubtedly lead to a more complex and diversified discourse concerning the appropriate manner in which issues of economic and political management should be tackled, at present these debates are still occurring within the framework of neoliberal ideology.

In addition to underlining the importance of the transition from the G-8 to the G-20, a topic that has received surprisingly little attention, we will focus upon the tensions within the G-20 between members of the G-8 and the expanded membership which comprises this new organization. Further, we will seek to analyze how the G-20 has responded to socioeconomic tensions within the global economy and if its reactions differ sharply from the responses to similar events by the G-8.

2008 - The Law and Society Association Words: 249 words || 
Info
4. Machado, Marta Rodriguez de Assis. "Penalty, Responsibility, and Communication in the Democratic State: A Debate between Günther Jakobs and Klaus Günther" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Hilton Bonaventure, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 27, 2008 <Not Available>. 2019-10-14 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p236741_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This Paper addresses the role of Criminal Law regarded essentially as communication, according to Günther Jakobs’s formulations on penalty. It focuses on the strengths and flaws associated with Jakobs’s theoretical framework and on the critique that may be leveled at his work from Klaus Günther’s theory on the assignment of responsibility in a Democratic State.
Jakobs brings original ideas to the field of Criminal Law doctrine, as he proposed a communicative conception of penalty, unrelated with its effects of “social psychology” – a position that he was unable to carry forward in his late works.
It is Klaus Günther who would be able to point to a communicative formulation of Criminal Law’s role in society. The concept of communication that he draws from Habermas allows him to recognize a social meaning conveyed through the imputation of responsibility itself. Responsibility hence gains autonomy as it is no longer regarded as a mere prerequisite for enforcing the punishment.
Based on this assumption, Günther sets the link between responsibility and democracy, as he claims that it is the citizens, through participation in the democratic decision-making processes, who should be able to decide on the criteria and rules governing imputation of responsibility. Furthermore, Günther does something innovative for the debate on Criminal Law policies: he shows that there is no intrinsic connection between imputation of guilt and penalty. As the latter is turned contingent, new possibilities are open for thinking on the proper role of Criminal Law in the face of violation of legal rules.

Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 57 - Next  Jump:

©2019 All Academic, Inc.   |   All Academic Privacy Policy