Guest  

 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Showing 1 through 5 of 817 records.
Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 164 - Next  Jump:
2010 - Theory vs. Policy? Connecting Scholars and Practitioners Pages: 25 pages || Words: 12328 words || 
Info
1. Kim, Tan. and Jho, Whasun. "Beyond American Hegemony: Transformation of American Hegemony and Formation of East Asian Counter Hegemony" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Theory vs. Policy? Connecting Scholars and Practitioners, New Orleans Hilton Riverside Hotel, The Loews New Orleans Hotel, New Orleans, LA, Feb 17, 2010 Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2019-12-09 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p415822_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In East Asia, where regional cooperation was thought to be difficult, a new wave of change is emerging. In December of 2009, the nations of ASEAN+3 have completed the signing of the official launch of CMIM(Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateral).The changes gain attention on two aspects. First, in East Asia, where skeptical views dominated cooperaton in the financial sector, cooperation is being realized in contrast to the existing notions, and this trend is rapidly developing ever since the 1997 Financial Crisis. Shortly after the 1997 crisis, despite the failure of discussion on Asian Monetary Fund(AMF) owing to the United States and the International Monetary Fund(IMF), debates on financial cooperation continued to endure, multilateral cooperation of CMI succeeded in 2010, based on the designs of CMI in 2000. Thus, the mechanism and the thrust behind financial cooperation of East Asia, of which the year 1997 was a threshold, merits one's attention. Second, the advance of financial cooperation in East Asia is in contrast with respect to the arguments of international studies scholars. The established arguments dealing with regional cooperation in East Asia failed to analyze the changing dynamics of East Asian regionalism, and were rather focused on the question 'why regional cooperation is stunned.' This study intends to analyze the reason why financial cooperation in East Asia is currently being pushed ahead and its structural dynamics based on 'critical theory' by Robert Cox.

2009 - Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference Pages: 29 pages || Words: 9541 words || 
Info
2. Suh, Fredrick. "Leadership, Hegemony, and International Organizations: Is Hegemony Necessary or Replaceable for Global Public Goods?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009 Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2019-12-09 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p360925_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Globalization makes a policy adopted by one state influence the welfare of other states. Since such an influence is often non-exclusive and non-rivalrous, a state produces a global public good from the perspective of other states. Global public goods ranging from liberal trade to controlling nuclear weapons tend to be provided suboptimally, since each state has an incentive to free-ride. Hegemonic stability theory and critics examined the relationship between the hegemon and provision of global public goods. In this paper, I analyze the role of the hegemon in providing global public goods and provide a more consistent explanation regarding the relationship. I call into question the argument that hegemony is sufficient or necessary for global public goods and argue that resolving a distribution problem is a key to provide a global public good efficiently. The hegemon might show efficient leadership in resolving a distribution problem, but asymmetric information is so costly to the hegemon in decentralized negotiation that the hegemon's incentive to lead other states for a global public good is questionable. By agreeing to delegate an international organization to negotiate with a state that produces a global public good, the hegemon and other states can achieve a Pareto-improving outcome.

2008 - ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES Pages: 18 pages || Words: 8758 words || 
Info
3. Antoniades, Andreas. "From 'Theories of Hegemony' to 'Hegemony Analysis' in International Relations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 49th ANNUAL CONVENTION, BRIDGING MULTIPLE DIVIDES, Hilton San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA, Mar 26, 2008 Online <PDF>. 2019-12-09 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p254276_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The paper deals with the phenomenon of hegemony in International Relations theory and practice. First, it develops a cartography of the existing approaches to hegemony in IR. Second, it discusses and evaluates two significant attempts to create a comprehensive framework for studying hegemony in world politics; that is, ‘agential approaches’ and ‘critical realist approaches’. The third section discusses the limitations of these two approaches, and proposes a new comprehensive framework for analysing the phenomenon of hegemony in IR. Rather than using agents and/or structures as its starting point, the proposed framework suggests approaching hegemony as a phenomenon of movement of power.

2016 - American Political Science Association Annual Meeting Words: 208 words || 
Info
4. Oatley, Thomas. "The Dual Faces of Hegemony: Revisiting Hegemony Stability in a Complex Network" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, TBA, Philadelphia, PA, <Not Available>. 2019-12-09 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1128716_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: I re-examine the explanatory leverage of hegemonic stability theory by reformulating its central insight using complex network theory. I first define hegemony in terms of two network statistics: the skewness of the degree distribution and node centrality. A hegemon is thus the most central node in a network characterized by a highly skewed degree distribution. I then define global economic stability in terms of the extent to which a shock (real or financial) that originates in one national economy selected at random spreads to other national economies through their trade and financial relationships. I use this network characterization to illustrate the two faces of hegemony. In one role, hegemony stabilizes the global economy in the face of random shocks. Thus, hegemony stabilizes the system in the face of most crises that occur. In its second role, however, hegemony destabilizes the global economy. Because the hegemon is strongly tied to almost all other countries, negative shocks in the hegemon radiate outward to and are amplified by almost all peripheral economies. Hence, hegemonic systems are both highly robust in the face of peripheral shocks and extremely fragile in the face of shocks at the center. I illustrate the argument with a variety of episodes drawn from the past 100 years.

Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 164 - Next  Jump:

©2019 All Academic, Inc.   |   All Academic Privacy Policy