Guest  

 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Showing 1 through 5 of 3,680 records.
Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 736 - Next  Jump:
2006 - American Political Science Association Words: unavailable || 
Info
1. Cho, Young-Im. "State Mediation v. IO Mediation: When do States Dump Mediation?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, <Not Available>. 2019-11-21 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p151694_index.html>
Publication Type: Proceeding

2006 - American Political Science Association Words: unavailable || 
Info
2. Cho, Young-Im. "State Mediation v. IO Mediation: When do states dump mediation?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, <Not Available>. 2019-11-21 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p151729_index.html>
Publication Type: Proceeding

2006 - The Midwest Political Science Association Words: 37 words || 
Info
3. Cho, Young. "State Mediation v. IO Mediation: When Do States Dump Mediation?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, <Not Available>. 2019-11-21 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p139745_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This paper examines the question "Why do states mediate some interstate conflicts and international organizations others?" By investigating this question, the paper attempts to clarify the context in which each of the two actors offer to mediate.

2008 - International Communication Association Words: 198 words || 
Info
4. Couldry, Nick. "Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, TBA, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, <Not Available>. 2019-11-21 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p230620_index.html>
Publication Type: Session Paper
Abstract: This paper asks to what extent we can identify the conditions under which digital storytelling will contribute to the sustaining or expansion of democracy. Those conditions are difficult to identify because it is unclear whether digital storytelling is a distinct stage in the history of mass communication, or part of the supercession of mass communication. The article considers the contrasting implications here of two rival concepts in media theory: ‘mediation’ and ‘mediatization’.
On balance, the article will argue that ‘mediation’ may prove more flexible for understanding digital storytelling, because it can address in greater detail the varied circumstances in which digital stories will become articulated into social and political organization: the paper will here draw on the lessons from the historical spread of printing and widespread literacy (Wuthnow, Communities of Discourse 1987). ‘Mediatization’, by contrast, suggests that all the consequences of digital storytelling can be explained by reference to one or more common ‘logics’ that dictate the form that digital story material must take. That prioritizes patterns of content over regularities of context and use. As a result, it may alert us less well to the more subtle consequences of a heterogeneous phenomenon such as digital storytelling.

2015 - International Communication Association 65th Annual Conference Pages: unavailable || Words: 9178 words || 
Info
5. White, Shawna., Rasmussen, Eric. and King, Andy. "Boomerang Effects in Restrictive Mediation: Investigating the Role of Reactance Using Serial Multiple Mediation Analysis" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association 65th Annual Conference, Caribe Hilton, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 21, 2015 Online <APPLICATION/BINARY>. 2019-11-21 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p978006_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Extant research on parental mediation of media content has found that restrictive mediation produces unintended effects in adolescents. Speculation exists that these suboptimal effects are due to psychological reactance following a restrictive mediation interaction leading the adolescent toward defiant behavior. A survey of undergraduate students (N = 483) was conducted to investigate the process of psychological reactance as a mediating factor in the relationship between restrictive parental mediation and three boomerang effects: negative attitude toward parents, positive attitude toward restricted content, and intention to view restricted content with friends. Results revealed that a direct effect was present between restrictive mediation and attitude toward parent, but not between restrictive mediation and attitude toward restricted content or intention to view restricted content with friends. Moreover, the reactance process fully mediated the relationship for attitude toward restricted content and intention to view restricted content with friends, but only partially mediated attitude toward parents.

Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 736 - Next  Jump:

©2019 All Academic, Inc.   |   All Academic Privacy Policy