Guest  

 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Showing 1 through 5 of 6,453 records.
Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 1291 - Next  Jump:
2011 - The Law and Society Association Words: 241 words || 
Info
1. Ainsworth, Stephanie., Portillo, Shannon. and Olaghere, Ajima. "Processing Administrative Hearings: Judicial Discretion and the Adversarial Process of Claims" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Westin St. Francis Hotel, San Francisco, CA, May 30, 2011 <Not Available>. 2018-12-13 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p495766_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Scholarship on administrative hearings has focused on ‘haves’ coming out ahead based on legal mobilization or the invocation of cultural capital (Kinsey & Stalans 1999). This project considers the process of administrative hearings, focusing on how administrative law judges conduct hearings when claimants are represented by legal counsel and represent themselves, pro se. Based off of non-participant direct observation of fifty unemployment insurance claim hearings, we find that administrative law judges use their discretion in similar ways to other street-level bureaucrats – largely based off of normative judgments of worthiness of the claimants they encounter. The presence of another legal actor influences the ways in which administrative law judges use their discretion when conducting hearings; they limit their discretion when claimants are represented by legal counsel. Administrative law judges, however, use their discretion to conduct administrative hearings in an inquisitorial, rather than adversarial manner, when they make positive normative judgments about pro se claimants. The change in process, however, does not influence outcomes of hearings; claimants who are represented by counsel are likely to succeed under the adversarial process while clients who are not represented are not likely to have outcomes in their favor regardless of an inquisitorial or adversarial process. The increasing professionalization, formalization, and centralization of administrative hearings may reign in judicial discretion in administrative hearings, increasing the litigation-like atmosphere of dispute resolution for administrative law cases. With more claimants represented by counsel, hearings become more litigation-like and adversarial.

2006 - American Society of Criminology (ASC) Words: 207 words || 
Info
2. Fahey, Susan. "Reconsidering SES and Family Process as Parallel Growth Processes" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC), <Not Available>. 2018-12-13 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p126237_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Economic status has been shown to affect nearly every family process that has been examined in the literature but not all of the family processes have been shown to affect delinquency. Parental monitoring has been demonstrated to be affected by economic status and has been shown to affect the level of adolescent delinquency. Thus, it is expected that as economic status increases, parental monitoring is expected to increase. In turn, low parental monitoring is expected to be associated with higher delinquency. The central question this research is intended to answer is how economic status and parental monitoring are related to each other and if they are each able to predict adolescent delinquency. A single class parallel growth model with delinquency as a distal outcome was estimated using Mplus, version 3.0 (Muthén and Muthén, 1998-2003). The data used in this study are the 1997 cohort of the National Longitudinal Youth Survey; a subset sample included 1744 adolescents. Monitoring was negatively, significantly related to delinquency. SES was found to be negatively but non-significantly related to delinquency and to maternal monitoring. In sum, there is no parallel growth between SES and maternal monitoring in this single class parallel model.

2012 - 43rd Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting Pages: unavailable || Words: 92 words || 
Info
3. Pearce, Steve., Maull, Roger. and Smart, Andi. "Customer Co-Production resources in Services Processes: Implications for Service Design and Process Efficiency." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 43rd Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting, San Francisco Marriot, San Francisco, CA, Nov 17, 2012 Online <PDF>. 2018-12-13 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p585037_index.html>
Publication Type: Non-Refereed Research Abstract
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Service System competitiveness is currently informed by solution oriented customer-centric designs. Such approaches resonate with Service Dominant Logic that emphasises the co-creation of value with customers. Current theory on Service Process Design, however, excludes an explicit consideration of the impact of co-production on efficiency. This paper addresses this phenomenon.

2015 - Advocating for the Silenced: The Educators’ Vocation Pages: unavailable || Words: unavailable || 
Info
4. Roth, William., Stowers, Patricia. and Kenyon, Tracy. "Bringing the Teacher Preparation Program Review Process into the 21st Century: Process, Product and Challenges" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Advocating for the Silenced: The Educators’ Vocation, Hyatt Regency Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, Feb 13, 2015 Online <PDF>. 2018-12-13 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p750782_index.html>
Publication Type: Single Paper Format
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In 2012, Teach Arizona piloted a web-based approach to teacher preparation program review. Presenters discuss the benefits and challenges of aligning to standards, assessing candidate progress and developing their website.

2007 - International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention Pages: 17 pages || Words: 6410 words || 
Info
5. Slye, Ronald. "Apology as a Judicial Process in the South African Amnesty Process" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Hilton Chicago, CHICAGO, IL, USA, Feb 28, 2007 <Not Available>. 2018-12-13 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p180755_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: What is the role of apology in the context of a process of accountability during a transition? Do apologies lead to reconciliation or sense of justice on the part of survivors of gross violations of human rights? The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission is the process most often cited to support the link among apologies, justice, and reconciliation. This paper will explore the linkages among these three concepts in a particular part of the South African process, that country?s amnesty process. Many of those who applied for amnesty apologized during their public hearings, often at the prompting of their attorneys. Sometimes amnesty committee members pressured applicants to apologize. Sometimes those apologies, and the other testimony of an applicant, lead a survivor to change from opposing to supporting amnesty for that individual. This paper will analyze the response of victims to apologies offered in the context of the South African amnesty process in order to ascertain whether apologies contributed to a sense of justice or reconciliation. It will be based on a thorough reading of the over 2000 days of hearings of the amnesty process, as well as interviews with applicants, survivors, attorneys, and committee members.

Pages: Previous - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 1291 - Next  Jump:

©2018 All Academic, Inc.   |   All Academic Privacy Policy